Do British accept their interference creates problems?

Question

I ask with respect to former US/UK ally Indonesian President Suharto's overthrow by the US & UK- (which we have ample documentary evidence detailing funding of subversives and other political parties & thugs).

which gave rise to Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) terrorsit being able to re-emerge as a major terrorists threat- culminating in the deaths of your own countrymen. Had Suharto been left in power- these terrorists would have simply vanished off the planet by our Special Forces.

I quote: "JI was formally founded on 1 January 1993 by DI leaders, Abu Bakar Bashir and Abdullah Sungkar while hiding in Malaysia from the persecution of the Suharto Government."

Furthermore under our new President General Yudhoyono- we have arrested and killed many militants including: Abu Dujana, Hambali and Zarkasih.
Some others we chose to simply detonate and let them see their beloved Allah, after their scraps were eaten by village dogs.

Will you now allow General Suharto to rule my nation even if by proxy?

We never blame the US or UK citizens- we know well that they have, as we do, scant control over their governments' actions.

Arty Morty- are you actually the erstwhile foe albeit in nome de plum of Sherlock Holmes.

Answer 1

We do accept that many countries problems can be traced back to some British meddling in their internal affairs, even with altruistic intentions. The middle east is a fine example. If we had held Israel more rigidly to the Balfour Mandate there may not have been the trouble there is today. But we were in no state to do so after WWII and hindsight is always 20-20.

With regards to your own country we have less to do with it than you seem to think. I'm afraid you will need answers from our cousins across the pond who are now playing the role that Britain did a century ago (albeit far, far more dangerously) and we seemed to get dragged along for the ride. Although since the ousting of Tony Blair I think this is all about to change.

Answer 2

If you don't "blame US/UK citizens" then maybe you should rephrase your question.

By asking "do the BRITISH accept . . ." and "Will YOU now allow General Suharto to rule . . . " then you are addressing us British citizens and claiming that *we ourselves* are responsible for these events. Its not up to us! Take it up with our Government! They don't really care about us let alone anyone else!

While in truth, as you say, we have little or no control over what our government does.

Answer 3

They butchered as many as they'd,understanding they have been in charge for organising the jewish company in 1920 and springing up Palestine for jewish immigration; understanding additionally that the mandate - British authority - would end interior a pair of years besides and that their jewish company advance right into a shadow government. It advance into mindless brutality of an extremely dispicable character. The crimes of their terrorist orgs of the era have been the worst the worldwide had ever seen from an NGO.

Answer 4

i agree with you completely. we should stop! interfering in other country's business. and except that they have the right to rule their own country's in the way that works! for them. we have stired up an Islamic hornets nest and thousands have been slaughtered because of it. if its any consolation my friend the British people are as sic of our governments interference in your country's affairs as you are.

Answer 5

Wtf are you asking exactly? because your question is sort of going in circles, talking about blaming the british, then not blaming them, then a load of rambling about suicide bombers and so on.....

and why do you ask "do BRITISH accept..." when the USA was involved as well???