...have a child with a guy you love even if you weren't married and knew that you'll have to separate eventually???
2007-09-15 00:41:16 · 23 answers · asked by ele 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Never..Because i want to have a fixed future for my child, built in a common life, with all my rights as a woman.The child needs two people, and he/she will grow up with the love of both in a healthy environment.
Then, dont forget that we are not like other european countries on this, the woman, and expecially the unmarried mother doesnt have the same rights, or the same appreciation..
She is always alone and less''covered''by the state and protected, plus she has to face the discrimination
2007-09-15 01:40:25 · answer #1 · answered by Leonarda 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No
Whats The Point On Raising A Child Without A Father When You Can Have A Happy Family With A Father And A Child
2007-09-15 07:46:48 · answer #2 · answered by Bubblegum_Faeire 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Question is why be with a guy that you know you will separate from?
I think children can grow up just fine with a single parent as long as the parent loves the child and devotes their life to raising him / her but I would worry about the effect of having Daddy simply disappear a few years down the line.....
2007-09-15 07:58:41 · answer #3 · answered by Fiona F 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I wouldn't .
Because I strongly believe that the ideal for a child is to grow up with both parents. I believe I do not have the right to have a child, knowing beforehand that this child will grow without his father.
Most of us, women, say that they will bring up the child , loving him/her for two (both parents). I know, we mean that. But the matter is the child. The child should have a father's presence no matter how much love he/she receives from mother.
2007-09-15 08:35:13 · answer #4 · answered by Alice in Wonderbra 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i would have a child with him even though we weren't married but not have to separate
2007-09-15 07:48:55 · answer #5 · answered by Hazel Eyes 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes to the unmarried part, no to the knowing we would be separated part. I would not bring a child into the world knowing it would end up with only 1 parent.
2007-09-15 07:48:40 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
oh
why without marriage
it's a good idea to have the fruit of that marriage
but better no
try to marry why not then separate !!!!!!!sorry
but your baby will have a father
2007-09-15 07:48:05 · answer #7 · answered by Cleopatra mohamed'redouane's mom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, kids should not suffer because their parents were stupid. If you see separation along the way, why bother to have a kid with him? Kids are not toiletries one takes home as souvenir from hotels.
2007-09-15 08:20:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, if we both loved each other then why would we separate? people dont have to be married to still love and be together.
JUST A QUICK NOTICE; JOHNNY DEPP HAS 2 KIDS; NOT 4!
2007-09-15 07:46:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't *TRY* to get pregnant, knowing we'd have to part ways eventually. But if I **OOPS!** got pregnant, I wouldn't terminate the pregnancy, I'd do my best for the child.
2007-09-15 07:52:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋