Once they serve the order of support on my employer, the employer has to start garnishing my wages because if they don't my employer can
A) Be fined and possibly be forced to pay the amount of the order as deemed by the courts
B) Have their business license suspended
This is if you look under the word "BLACKMAIL" or EXTORTION" in a dictionary these are both one and the same, but yet they can easily get away with it, but let me try and extort or blackmail someone and I will get a free stay at the Crossbar Hotel.
Maybe this is wrong but them using someone's social security number without their consent is a crime too? I mean if they can obtain your social security number and freely use it shows your social security number is really a way for the government to track you for their advantage and makes it really worthless!
As defined by Merriam Webster-Blackmail=extortion or
2007-09-14 23:06:59 · 6 answers · asked by Loves Los Angeles 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8M7cEi61W24
2007-09-14 23:07:28 · update #1
click on the link and watch the video before you comment
2007-09-14 23:15:05 · update #2
And they say two wrongs don't make it right.
2007-09-14 23:13:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can answer that Serpico7. A lot of states just go right to the employer now. No chance for the "offender" to be given the opportunity to pay on his own. He didn't have to violate a court order. I went thru a civil action The DA was not involved but EX asked the court she be paid according to state law which is in fact garnishment of wages Ha I'll be smiling when some of you actually find out what it's like. Just one tidbit as example. I'm not in arrears,My daughter is 18 out of school working for at least ten$ an hour. Yet I'm still paying child support for her over a year because the EX is evading and delaying the proceedings to cancel.
2016-05-20 00:43:44 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a garnishment of wages is a COURT ORDER. This is the law, and if your employer fails to obey the law, then it is punishable. Plain and simple. The child support enforcement people didn't do it, the COURT ordered it.
When you divorced and/or were order to pay child support, YOU gave them your social security number, and so did the mother of this child. Again the COURT used your social security number, not the mother of the child or child support enforcement. Again, this is legal.
it may be a bitter pill to swallow, but it's time to step up and be a man and take care of your debts and obligations without making the government (meaning us taxpayers) foot the bill to prosecute you so that the child that YOU created is taken care of properly.
Carol Rhodes opinions are dismissable at best. She is a paid lobbiest for "father's rights", and made her own interpretation of child support enforcement laws so that she could attempt to use it in a ploy to lobby for her special interest group backers. Although she is an educated woman, she is not an attorney or a judge or officer of the court, so she is not qualified to pass a legal judgement regarding any programs funded and enforced through a court of competant jurisdiction.(she is what is considered a "friend of the court"---like a liason or advocate) Her job is to simply stir the pot.
2007-09-14 23:57:36 · answer #3 · answered by simmychick 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Usually they would only go through your employer if you weren't paying your child support. So to save your employer the hassle of being "BLACKMAILED" as you call it, pay it to YOUR children's carer and this won't happen.
2007-09-14 23:31:48 · answer #4 · answered by Aquarius0276 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you don't like to pay your child support, quit having babies that you have no intention of supporting. Grow up and be a real man.
2007-09-14 23:12:38 · answer #5 · answered by janicajayne 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with all of the above
2007-09-14 23:48:20 · answer #6 · answered by Brandi 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋