do you think acting is something that is MORE of a gift or development??

Question

obviously both...but which more do you think??

Answer 1

Interesting question.
A clue is that actors like to imagine a character from the inside out, rather than copy surface characteristics.
Yes, both, but a large proportion of gift.

Answer 2

I think it's more of a gift, but that any one could try to develop the skills, as with anything else. The reason I say it is more of a gift is because I have a 2-year-old niece who does a lot of impressions of people. It may seem expected that someone as young as 2 would copy people but she does not just copy. She watches you and actually stands in the mirror doing things she saw someone do or dancing around and stuff. I have 6 nieces and nephews but she is the only one who does that.

Answer 3

I think it has a lot of gift, but even if you have the gift you will need to practice,and develop

Answer 4

It is more on development in the sense that it is similar to inheritance. A child inherit his talent as heritage, think and act according to what he observed in the family, being influenced what other member of the family is doing. To prove this most of the movie moguls belong to clan involved in movie industry.

Answer 5

Talent for acting is inborn, a natural gift. It can be developed through only one thing-experience acting. You cannot learn to act in a class.

Answer 6

Some people who are more confident might be better at it than others , but it's still a development thing.

Answer 7

development

Answer 8

having a gift helps, but no good actor got where they are without practise and passion.