20-20 as a format looks promising but this
Bowl out rule in the event of a tie sucks big time.
i cant believe the administrators couldn't come up with other innovative ways.
After all what's so tough about hitting 3 stumps , as india displayed [yesterday] , all that you will need is someone just bowl it slowly even without a proper run up.
In geoffery's slang "EVEN MY MOM COULD DO THAT"
no offence to pakistanis though they couldn't do it. they just were lookin a bit perplexed and needlessly complicated such a simple stuff.
2007-09-14 20:37:29 · 8 answers · asked by psychic being 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
I donno much technical about it.....
But as a cricket lover ,I feel it really interesting....
"no offence to pakistanis though they couldn't do it. they just were lookin a bit perplexed and needlessly complicated such a simple stuff."---------that makes the game interesting------
2007-09-14 20:44:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pakistan s*cks. Inzi hits a ball thrown at the stumps with the bat and was arguing with the umpire when he was obviously out.
The cheats the kick the ball out of the hand of the bowlers and then claim that what they did is fair-play.
Their keepers appeal for LBW even if the ball has been smacked clearly off the bat.
They believe that sledging, not talent can win them games.
And they are horrible losers who can't take a loss in their stride and keep whining that what happened with them wasn't fair.
I think they deserved to lose the game and the bowl-out is a great rule
2007-09-14 20:51:46 · answer #2 · answered by The ROCK 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I strongly feel that the bowl out is a big tamasha and take away the credit of the teams. In the event of a tie credit swhould be given equally to both the teams for taking the match to the wire and both the teams should be declared as joint winners which will beonly fair to both the teams.
2007-09-15 00:56:33 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The bowl out is really poor idea.
I hope they will have a rethink on this soon.
They could have had a 5-5 over stint just like the extra time in Hockey/football.
After all there won't be such matches often.
2007-09-14 22:22:51 · answer #4 · answered by karikalan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thank God. the rule came very much as a saviour to the Indian Team. Now they can look forward to meeting the other teams and improve up on their competitive skills.
Poor Pakisthanis ! None of their three bowlers could hit the stumps.
2007-09-14 21:02:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the rule as such is as silly as the twenty20 cricket.it can never compete with odi.as for yesterday's match it was even more silly.Both the teams will advance to the next stage anyway and they don't even carry over the points.And why did only india-pak match become such a cilff hanger?I think the ICC had cleverly manipulated this match while we foolish people watch it and think it to be all true.
2007-09-14 20:49:28 · answer #6 · answered by poison ivy 606 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Pakistan should have bowled the under-arm...yes it sux.
2007-09-14 21:04:14 · answer #7 · answered by brissy_006 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no no
this was a cool idea .................
well we are no one to decide so accept whatever happens:)
2007-09-14 22:42:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋