a guy has offered me a job (conditional on him being able to scrounge some grant monsy etc.) and i am trying to check out his credibility in the field (which tells me both how good the job is and the likely hood that said grant money is worth waiting for). The job is only RA level, but it will still be good to work with the most reputable poeple i can find.
He doesn't seem to have any publications in the specific field the job would be investigating. I asked him for some recomended reading and he says he has a couple of paitents, and i have found a few with his last name and first innitial so that seems to check it out?
I want to find some of his other publications but he has a common surname and first innitial so it seems hard to fathom which are his. He has given some from his lab in general, which seem pretty goood, but i wanrt to check out his personal track record as well.
General advice from some scientists please?
2007-09-14
18:59:31
·
2 answers
·
asked by
K
3
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Other - Science
his personal track record in public publications may have been hindered by working for companies for a few years, hence patients instead.
how much "checking out" is polite and socially acceptable in Auslralian science?
2007-09-14
19:00:38 ·
update #1