I don't like Hillary, but how could anyone support a crazy bald cross-dresser for president of the US?
2007-09-14 15:21:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I guess comming from boonyville you have not had the experience with Rudy that New Yorkers have had. Clinton will out poll the snake in New York by 12 points. If you want to know something about Rudy, ask the firemen who are the real and only heros of 911. Rudy spent the time trapped in his misplaced "command center". Or ask the volunteers who will spend their lives caughing their lungs out cause Rudy repeatedly told them the air was safe at ground zero. Where is he now? Just keeping his mouth shut and pretending he didn't do it. They don't call him the snake for nothing.
2007-09-14 15:40:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by sSuper critic 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
I dislike HIllary and Rudy. I think they both would make awful President's personally.
This is coming from the left looney. Not a Nazi, you are free to think whatever you want. But I don't see a question here.
2007-09-14 15:58:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ellinorianne 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately for you Rudy will not win because he is not a kiss up to the white house. The white house is pushing Thompson. He is their man because he will be a puppet like Bush. Rudy is to liberal in their views. By the way I am a independent so I have no loyalty to either party. True Americans don't follow parties but vote for the best person to be president.
2007-09-14 15:26:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by john a 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I've been feeling a little Democratic since George Bush invaded Iraq instead of staying in Afghanistan and getting the man responsible for 9/11 and that was Osama Bin Laden. I don't care about parties usually; I vote for the man. But Bush has screwed the US so badly that I will be voting for the Democrat nominee this time. But I feel sorry for whoever it is because they're getting one h*** of a mess dropped in their lap.
2007-09-14 15:59:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Feeling bi partisan but hate Hillbill to my last breathe. That igit boasted about knowing of "9 specific threats to aircraft in the Pacific rim" on the golf course in Hawaii as he waided out Monica gate. Fool Swissair111 went down that fall Pan Pan pan and Hijack oh no just send it to Canada then Exec priviledge it away. Search for three years for clues when the cargo had oops a few mil ingold bars a Picassoand ... amazing what the internet had online the day after including the Pax manifest and why di the Washington Post run away with copies of my reports??/ And I have more................ microfiche and old fasshion libraries are amazin.
Take Mickey Michels producer of Hunt for red october's second guy to warner's prop for a satellite missle tracking device and see if I care that u know my name mr FBI man
Was that a good drunk impersonation or what? I feelin it.
No protest here. Keep writin on.
2007-09-14 15:33:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Rudy Giuliani is the Republican threat to Hillary Clinton in case the two will be nominated by their parties.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-09-14 19:02:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
whilst I empathize with the rank and record Dems who had no longer something to do with the date and merely would desire to make their selection count quantity, the actuality maintains to be that the state financial disaster of the Democratic social gathering in each and every case knew what the DNC threatened to do in the event that they moved the date and that they took the gamble. regardless of the "necessary paper path legislations" linked to the Florida GOP backed invoice to bypass the date, the social gathering would desire to have voted against the circulate and had their chairperson say WHY they adversarial it each and every time they have been asked for remark. If voters sense that strongly appropriate to the paper path, it would nevertheless ensue in a bi-partisan trend...after all, the two Dems AND Republicans would desire to make particular their votes count quantity and are counted wisely. That having been suggested, the maths says that neither candidate can win with out superdelegates so including the two lower back in would desire to help to maintain them from having to come lower back to a decision and elevate questions of thwarting the "will of the persons". The fairest thank you to handle it would be: place those 2 the very final interior the cycle so as that if the two area concedes formerly the date, the DNC can merely choose for to no longer do it lower back. tension the state events in each and every state to run a undeniable dollar volume of promotion reminding voters that a "re-do" is coming and while they'd desire to sign in to be eligible to vote. additionally, the state events would desire to be compelled to pony up for the election costs...it particularly is THEIR fault the date moved.
2017-01-02 05:23:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
why the party? its the person who is supposed to represent the majority, which hasnt been done for decades. bush has been the worst ive seen, next comes reagan. clinton was cool because he got the most famous bj that has ever been given. his policies were cool, but he got duped by bob dole, who needed viagra to get it up. it supposedly takes an hour to take effect. by that time monica would have been long gone. and so it goes........
2007-09-14 15:39:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by chris l 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Like I have said many times; while we are all bashing each other over some little comment some Politician said or did not say.
The politicians are screwing us all.
They are not separate, divided, or against one another.
They are all in cahoots with one another.
Poli --Latin, means Many
tics -- small blood sucking paracite
2007-09-14 15:25:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dionannan 5
·
2⤊
0⤋