We were lied to about WMD and now we are lied to about bringing the troops home. Why do people still believe him? His general gave the same speech in 2004 so how has anything changed in iraq?
2007-09-14 15:03:08 · 23 answers · asked by john a 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
southron2002, please provide a link where I can see any evidence that has been found linking Saddam and the 9/11 attacks. I believe we've been since told that there was no link....
2007-09-14 15:28:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nope, he has shown he won't pay attention to the yankee people. Now he needs to attend on a Sept. checklist till now any action is taken. The impeachment of Bush and Cheney is the only process action for Democrats. no longer one greater might desire to die in Iraq.
2016-12-13 09:27:25 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Quick question to your question. Aren't we still in Germany and Japan. How long ago was that. Do you not realize the fact that we all have something to gain when America flexes its muscle to stay a dominate power. That's right you can go to bed now and not worry about what you will have to eat tomorrow, or if you will get kidnapped and held for ransom. As a matter of fact you don't have to worry about getting blown up from IED's or mortors. Or being shot at and never seeing your family again. Maybe you should be thankful you have the right to ask such a question.
2007-09-14 15:39:58 · answer #3 · answered by Megan O 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No.
Bush said that the war on terror would be long. You did not listen.
You were not “lied to” about WMD’s. You did not listen.
WMD’s were there, the Dems in charge before bush took office said so. You did not listen.
Some were found, most were moved. You did not listen.
Saddam was indeed involved with 9/11. You did not listen.
You were told that Iraq is the main battlefield but the only one in the war on terrorism. You did not listen.
Keep your earplugs in and keep drinking your KoolAide. Maybe, just maybe you will open your eyes.
2007-09-14 15:18:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Why is it that libs are so dense?
1) Pres. Bush said from the beginning that this war would last until after his presidency was over. Libs refused to believe him seeking to distroy everything he tries to do. Suddenly, when they find that he meant what he said, they can't handle it and must make up new lies to cover their first ones.
2) Why is it so hard to believe that some intelligence is kept from the general public in order to prevent the enemy from knowing our every battle plan? But I suppose when the libs and the enemy are in bed together, it would only make sense tat they seek to find out as much as they can.
3) Libs would rather listen to some blow-hard who doesn't have a clue about anything (i.e. Hillary Clinton with health-care, military ops, education, national security, etc., etc., etc.) than listen to the professionals who make a living performing those trades.
2007-09-14 15:20:36 · answer #5 · answered by Wookie 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I believe he will, and he never knowingly lied about WMD. He was telling us what he believed was the truth. After all several leading Democrats said the same thing about Saddam and his WMD and this was before Bush was president.
2007-09-14 15:19:36 · answer #6 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
He won't take them out of Iraq because he wants to leave office with a "positive" note. He probably knows that this war is not going to end in our favor, and he's focusing on his image while he still has one left.
2007-09-14 15:34:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
President Bush knows that there is no chance for him to win in Iraq, so he will keep the troops in Iraq til the end of his presidency. He wants the next President to clean up his mess.
2007-09-14 15:15:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Why dont you tell your accusation to Mr. Clinton too. He started "Saddam has WMD." in the 90s.
Yes and I believe President Bush will start bringing troops home when he believes it is safe to do so.
2007-09-14 15:10:25 · answer #9 · answered by Samm 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
No. Bush is not going to cut & run. He's going to leave it for the next President to deal with.
2007-09-14 15:22:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋