English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

who else thinks that one world organizations like the U.N., World Bank, E.U, A.U., and the "to be" NAU(North american union) is a threat to National soverignty, freedom, aids corruption and can lead to rise to tyranny?

2007-09-14 12:52:09 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government International Organizations

5 answers

Apparently not very many other people or such things would not happen. Personally, I don't care. When all the world ends, Jesus will come back and redeem us again.

2007-09-14 12:56:25 · answer #1 · answered by dragonbot 2 · 0 0

Yes. There is no doubt about it; how many times has the U.N. told the U.S. how to fight in a war, what was permitted, what was not; that the U.S. was to turn the military over to the U.N. to be run. That is the main reason we "lost" in Viet Nam.
Communism was spread under the U.N.; relief to war-torn nations and others needing assistance had their goods stolen by the U.N. and other "World" organizations.
They should be banned!
At the very least, the U.S. should NOT support these organizations until they comply with OUR standards and enforce democracies, not terrorists, fascists, communists, et al.

2007-09-14 20:05:02 · answer #2 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 0 0

To tell you the truth, I'm only concerned with the union the United States can be involved in. The US is the most influential and powerfull nation in the world, hence more prone to tyranny. I'm not a fan of glabalization, but with the US, that would be called Imperialism.

2007-09-14 20:08:56 · answer #3 · answered by Zoe S. 3 · 0 0

One proof on they're not threats is this talk that I believe will continue. National Sovereignty is not dependent on the deal with those organizations on their own nature - they are alliances and not super states - and every strong state is essentially a good dealer= respected and has no doubt on its own identity, history, culture and independence. To doubt that differences are a source of wealth is to deny one of the basis of the USA= being a melting pot as never been questioned in terms of making it loose identity, was one of its characteristic points. To deny it is an error because is based on fear and threats that if have any effect will make enemies "win" their "games", those exact ones you're talking here.

2007-09-14 20:10:34 · answer #4 · answered by . 3 · 0 0

You should watch 'America: Freedom to Facism'. It's a DVD documentary about all sorts of interesting things. One of the things that this guy talks about is this exact issue. He gives a pretty good arguement for why the U.S. keeps it's borders open, and how it affects our sovriegnty. It's a tad bit low budget, but very informative.

2007-09-14 19:58:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers