English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I continue to hear different definitions for the word "win".

2007-09-14 10:59:49 · 12 answers · asked by anonymous 3 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

12 answers

The whole world wants to know, but nobody is asking!!!

2007-09-14 11:11:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Its approximately empires and buried treasure: Saudi Arabia (the only vaguely US-sympathetic center East oil State) is calling ever extra probable to fall to the fundamentalists. It has the main oil. Iran has been on the up for an prolonged time. Its have been given plans to run all the oil interior the middle East (it has the 0.33 best aspects). Iraq has the 2d best shares of oil and its the only State available to be invaded (and able to producing adequate pitifuly vulnerable excuses to make blatant imperialistic invasion appropriate to the gullible US public). whilst Saudi is going down it turns into area of the Iranian Empire. Syria (no oil, yet loads of impression) should help Iran. Jordan will fall too. Its vulnerable militarily and economically. Iraq will fall to the Iranians too. With an Iran-led fundamentalist empire of this length, the West would be paying regardless of Ahmadinejad demands for all the oil east of Washington. So what to do? u . s . made up thoughts approximately WMD, 911 etc and incredibly have been given rightous approximately what a bad guy Saddam grew to become into, so as that they'd get in there and make Iraq an American colony and consequently sustain the climate of the black stuff. Getting administration of Iraq additionally has the excellent element approximately offering a bulwark between Saudi and Iran (in simple terms in case the U. S. can in a roundabout way save Saudi onside). So, its approximately oil. So, its a pair of extensive Iran-led Islamic Empire extra prosperous than the U. S. and incredibly waiting to change all its commerce in direction of the hot monetary giants - China and India. reliable lord, do not issues seem rocky for the west! it incredibly is a conflict for supplies that would have been gained extremely. regrettably, Bush, his nutcase cronies and the mad, aggressive techniques of the U. S. military have all conspired to establish that the war is already lost. extra perfect positioned money right into a windmill employer!

2016-10-08 21:12:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What we are trying to do is train enough Iraqis so that they can provide their own security. You can't just expect to build up an army from scratch in no time at all. I t will take time and there will be more sacrifice. Even though when it finally happens and we withdraw most of our troops, there will still be some American forces there. Sort of like with what we have in South Korea because Iran is a threat to that region.

2007-09-14 11:12:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Mission Impossible.

2007-09-14 11:09:34 · answer #4 · answered by oatie 6 · 0 1

Eliminate Al-Quada

2007-09-22 08:22:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The real "mission" is to keep the eyes of Americans blinded by the SHOW.

2007-09-20 14:16:18 · answer #6 · answered by wayne_burdeshaw 5 · 0 0

to secure the nation of Iraq so we can exploit it for oil and place another puppet string ruler in charge in hopes this one will not turn on the US government, because the last thing we need is a wayward puppet country

2007-09-22 02:38:01 · answer #7 · answered by Laine 4 · 0 0

I think our people were sent over to help svae lives, but intead we are losing more as our men keep on getting killed, i wish war never existed, this is a terrible and cruel world in my opponion.

2007-09-22 08:06:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Teach the Iraqi's how to defend themselves

2007-09-21 23:36:11 · answer #9 · answered by cheri h 7 · 0 0

Maybe the new president will be able to figure that out.

2007-09-21 08:48:52 · answer #10 · answered by Jess 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers