TO LET THEM KNOW HOW *WE* HAVE FELT FOR EIGHT YEARS.
2007-09-14 09:44:56 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
It's just a question for fun. She will be our next President, and it just tickles the crap out of me.
WOO-HOOOO!
2007-09-14 09:49:59 · update #1
To nafsllib: If it is a choice of THEIR version or OUR version, I'll take Hillary.
***I'm still waiting for the Candidate in Shining Armor****
2007-09-14 09:56:19 · update #2
To LuckyLady20: Hey, don't fuss at me because YOU are too lazy to research her accomplishments.
Google is a wonderful thing.
2007-09-14 09:57:51 · update #3
Why not?
I suppose that we must favor the results in history of having males in charge.
Let me count the wars! Oh! Never mind, there are too many.
I don’t share the girly-boy Party of God fear and loathing of women. I am, therefore, not afraid of The Hillary. We have suffered 7 years under The Dubya and the country, amazingly enough, still exists.
Hillary, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden or Johnny Edwards are every one vastly more qualified to be dog catcher than Dubya. I imagine any of them would do a good job as President as well when you think that Ronny and Daddy Bush didn’t manage to sink the country.
I would give up my boat to see just how historians will treat the disaster that was the Republican foray into mismanaging the national politic. I suppose those 20 years must be the worst example of what passes for US government in our entire history.
I’d give Hillary a chance if the country can overcome its well established prejudice against females.
Barack seems to be getting a bit too much combative and I think Hillary’s refusal to support gay marriage is trying to be both modern, with the Civil Union euphemism and still cling to the Christian obsession with just how others enjoy sex.
I suppose honesty is so poorly rewarded that a candidate would be ill-advised to indulge in too much of it.
The supportable observation appears to be that no matter what people tell themselves and others, facts ain’t really all that popular.
Hillary 1,763 times over any Republican that breathes air. Having said that, the Repubs do have John McCain, their only candidate with a modicum of character but when he made his deal to support Dubya’s useless war Jonny done himself in, as far as I’m concerned.
I understand why he did it since I watched as the party made a concerted effort to TRASH him when he wanted to run in 2000. To see a bunch on non-achievers, military shirking, party hacks not qualified to polish his dress shoes denigrate a proven patriot and national hero like McCain made me want to vomit.
We have seen through our observation of history how mediocrity rises to the top, time and again. The Republican Party must the combined personification of this sad history.
Jim D
2007-09-15 00:58:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure Hillary may seem like she has great plans for this country but right now a women for president wouldn't be this countries best move. I am a women myself, it would be awesome to finally have a women for president. This would just make foreign countries hate use even more(since most foreign countries don't respect women rights). Besides with all the terrorist groups a women wouldn't be the best the thing to help this. We need a strong "alpha leader" that is willing to sacrifice his self for this country.
2015-10-30 16:10:27 · answer #2 · answered by jc 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is politically savvy and has the social, political, and financial resources to get things done. However, is that what we really want? Another iconic, piece-of-the-political-machine type? Americans have expressed concern over health care. After the 93 health care fiasco, will she give it another go? At the same time, Barack Obama (to be frank, the only other candidate with a chance to get beyond the primaries) has some ideas that are off the beaten path. Intelligent? YES. Well-spoken? YES. I don't know about you but I'm really discouraged by the candidate selections for 08. No one really appeals to me.
2007-09-14 09:56:17 · answer #3 · answered by FANatic 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
As a liberal democrat I feel that Hillary could be the democrats version of what we have had the past 6 years and 8 months.
2007-09-14 09:54:47 · answer #4 · answered by nafsllib 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
There is a place for Hillary, I just don't believe it will be in the White House when 08 comes.
2007-09-14 13:06:35 · answer #5 · answered by Cleo 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm going to vote for HIllary to break the glass ceiling on the Presidency in this country. Countries that have had female heads of state include England, India, Israel, hell, even Pakistan, a Muslim nation. It's about time the United States had one too.
2007-09-14 10:29:20 · answer #6 · answered by Judy L 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I have only two reasons to vote for the C*N*
Hell froze over
Pigs started flying
that's the only reasons I could come up with
2007-09-14 10:05:51 · answer #7 · answered by F yahoo in Ash 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
What did Hillary accomplish as Senator for the State of New York. I hate it when people say "oh I'm voting for Hillary (or Barac or whomever it may be)" and you say "Why" and they can never give actual reasons or accomplishments. I think thats very sad.
VOTE FOR MIKE GRAVEL
2007-09-14 09:55:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
I have to admit: one of the reason's I'm voting for Hillary, is because some people that I don't like will be mighty pissed off if she wins. I also think she's one of the better candidates.
2007-09-14 09:53:14 · answer #9 · answered by Stephen L 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Because she'll probably win the Democratic nomination, and the Republicans have
a) not a single decent candidate
b) dragged our country through the mud for 7 years
c) destroyed their party's credibility by having a new scandal every week
d) all of the above
2007-09-14 09:56:36 · answer #10 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋