Is that fair for those of us American's who look at the findings for an accurate picture on the war in Iraq.
How can we support our leaders and military when we only get half truth and only the positive portions of the report. We look to these reports for deciding direction and the way they are being presented is not valid.
We are all watching this war very close and it shows how we are being underminded when the reports are shown to favor Bush instead of the troops
2007-09-14 08:07:58 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
All of the liars believe they will be reaping the profits from this war and siding with the joke in the white house... money talks, absolute power corrupts... Betray-us has betrayed the troops and his peers... it's sad... I wonder what his mother must think...she couldn't possibly be proud...
2007-09-14 08:16:09 · answer #1 · answered by crkrjx 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Simply by disrespecting the General by bastardizing his name into "Betray-Us" you have shown us all that you are nothing more than ignorant pond-scum that doesn't possess the intelligence to engage in real political discourse on a site such as this. I recommend you stay on MoveOn.org with the rest of the ignorant pond-scum. For the record: General P. has both a masters and a doctoral degree from Princeton University. Where did you do your post-graduate work? Inquiring minds want to know!!
2007-09-14 08:26:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That has nothing to do with supporting your military. You stand behind them, or by all means, in front of them. They're DEAD so you can sit on your computer and talk crap about the government. That is your right because someone's daddy was blown up and never came home. Disagree with our Commander in Chief, but always support our military. I find it interesting that you group the military with our leaders. Military is LEAD.
Oh and General Betray-Us? You must be on the same committee that came up with Brangelina.
2007-09-14 08:15:53 · answer #3 · answered by colley411 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think your question would have more weight if you referred to the man by his proper title. As for the rest. This is the nature of this administration. The next 18 months are going to be very interesting.
2007-09-14 08:34:59 · answer #4 · answered by gone 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're saying 'presently after'. ask your self what it grew to become into like till now the invasion began. as nicely that.... why ought to we combat for yet another countries liberation? To my way of thinking, a rustic ought to be asked in the event that they choose liberation first & the actual invaders who're there to sell liberty ought to desire to free up that united states of america. If our own countries leaders have been straightforward interior the naming of the invasion, it would have been "operation take down hussein". as a question of actuality interior the making plans, my costly. you are able to desire to take it sluggish to flick by using some previous newspaper's from 2001 - 2003.... This invasion grew to become into unplanned..... whilst it grew to become into time to abort the venture, through fact "we had gained", we could no longer pass away the mess that have been created. The mess grew to become into created through fact the rustic have been left and not making use of a frontrunner. no one in cost of a finished united states of america... Looting, Gang -Forming, mass ignore - i'm no longer asserting that Hussein did an wonderful interest.... yet, a minimum of, the rustic grew to become into policed. The U.S. may be a great-ability.... yet we ought to continually no longer get that at a loss for words with great-hero. The Invasion lacked the plan: 'what to do for management after the present management is taken down'.
2016-11-10 10:58:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Liberals can't tolerate the Idea that Al Qaeda is having their behinds handed to them
2007-09-14 08:21:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It seems to me nobody here can agree on whether Gen P. is a commie liberal who is trying to stop the war or a Bush stoolie lying to keep it continued.
The whole thing seems strange to me! Maybe he's just a general trying to do his job!
2007-09-14 08:11:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He has done that since his first report in April 2003.
"We are going to turn the corner in two month, we are almost there" since 4 years.
2007-09-14 08:13:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I see you have been reading liberal propaganda websites again. How about instead of whining so much, YOU join the military and go see for yourself.
2007-09-14 08:15:50 · answer #9 · answered by Vwgirl18 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
1. there is no such general
2. stop being a parrot and grow a brain to think for yourself
3. either show proof he is lying or please shut the hell up
2007-09-14 08:22:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋