http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/clinton.htm
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/panthers.asp
but are outraged when liberals refuse to keep silent when America gets betrayed AGAIN and expose cold hard facts?
Can any amount of spin cover up the damage the Bush presidency has done to America and the world?
2007-09-14 07:50:27 · 9 answers · asked by justgoodfolk 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They aren't any better than the 9/11 conspiracy theorists.
2007-09-14 07:58:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Assuming you meant to say "non-conservatives, here's a truth to discredit "non-conservatives". America's problems with alleged damage began when the democrat press and other media and the democrat presidential hopefulls decided to abandon their country during wartime and launch their daily onslaught of false criticism of the President for no other reason than hoping that it would increase the votes for their own party in the next election. To consider one's own political power as being more important than the security of their own country is shameful, even though those same people have no shame. Just because the media and those politicians hope that their spin will be taken as cold hard facts, doesn't make it cold, hard facts.
2007-09-14 08:14:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because cons can't win using the truth. You might think that just the fact that they have to use lies would be an indication to them that they are in the wrong. But then they manage to lie to themselves and end up actually believing their own lies. They just can't tolerate change in general. And find it more comfortable to be lazy and hold on to outdated beliefs that are not as good as many liberal beliefs.
As for Bush's spin, it's for the already converted and ignorant. No one who actually thinks, pays attention, and has integrity trusts him any more.
2007-09-14 08:04:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Whoa, JGF - that door definitely swings BOTH ways. The left even has the MSM to spread their lies for them. The Rather/Memo problem, Reuters and the LA Times with Photoshopping addictions, NY Times knowingly printing a story that was false......
2007-09-14 07:56:12 · answer #4 · answered by Jadis 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
If one were less biased oneself, one might observe this trend to be at least a two-way street and would refrain from asking a question of this nature.
If one were interested in unity of the American people, one might just accept and allow free speech.
2007-09-14 07:56:31 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Because despite their claim - big media is on their side.
NewsCorp - headed by Rupert Murdoc leads the constant broadcast and re-distribution of these kinds of lies via blogs and political commentary.
2007-09-14 07:56:36 · answer #6 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Why on earth would conservatives have to lie to discredit liberals? Every time your kind opens your mouth you do that better than we ever could.
2007-09-14 07:59:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
It's all they have. Maybe they got the tactic for the religious fanatics in their party.
2007-09-14 07:55:42 · answer #8 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
It seems to work for them.
2007-09-14 08:00:39 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋