I was reading the article in regard to the Goldman's appearing on Oprah(http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070914/ap_en_ot/simpson_book_winfrey), and talking about the book that they published after they took rights from OJ Simpson, and Mr Goldman said this..."It brings a certain level of satisfaction that we've taken something from him," he said. "I think it also is a recognition for him to know forevermore that we're going to be after him ... to punish him for what he's done, to get some piece of justice."
Now I've had friends and family members taken from me, violently and otherwise, and the pain of that is so devastating, so I can empathize with their feelings. However, while I may have gone after the rights of the book, it would have been to stop it from being published. People already know if they think he's innocent or not. And in my opinion, if it is a "confession" it just further glorifies the fact that he got away with it...
But how would you have handled this situation?
2007-09-14
07:38:13
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Miss J
2
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
@spotsb4myeyes...
i appreciate your opinion, but how would you feel this situation should have been handled? so are you saying that you too, in this situation would have published this book if it were about how your son was killed, written by the "killer"? And how will OJ make money off a book he doesn't have rights to?
2007-09-14
07:57:01 ·
update #1
@robert, I tend to agree with you Robert...
2007-09-14
07:59:57 ·
update #2