Socialist and victim-hood enabling candidates please move to the rear of the line. That includes Mr. Obama.
2007-09-14 07:24:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
There's really not much thought that can be given to this. Michelle Obama knows her husband keeps falling further behind Clinton as each week goes by. There are a few states where they are close, but in most states he's over 20 points behind her. It's just her way of trying to do damage to Sen. Clinton, and we'll hear more comments like this as the race goes forward. She's been talking about Hillary a lot, but it hasn't seemed to make any difference whatsoever in the polls. The more that she and Elizabeth Edwards talk about Hillary Clinton the more people tend to wonder why it's left to them to try and criticize Hillary, when it should be coming from the candidates themselves, not their wives. I think this continued trend will backfire on them badly if they keep it up. Mostly because it's a woman vs. woman thing. I don't recall any wives in the past Presidential elections who publicly called out or talked so much about the rival male candidates, can you? But because Clinton is a woman and the male candidates have to tip toe to make sure they don't sound like misogynists, the wives are taking up the slack. Personally, I think it's a bad move, but we'll see how it shakes out.
2007-09-14 07:36:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i understand approximately 350 people (a social team) who voted for Obama and ditched Hillary because of the fact what he stood for while he became working against her. After his FilpFlopping and now adopting Hillary's suggestions, approximately 80 5 % won't vote this election and something have not made their suggestions yet. Mr. Obama could have his cherleaders for the duration of practice run, yet except he tells the electorate what he's made out of and what he has in keep for them, i'm afraid the wonderful November score would be his very own doing and not the 350 he inspired while he became working against Hillary.
2016-11-15 05:45:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
She's right in the statement that Democracy isn't about whose turn it is. There are issues to discuss and simply voting for someone or not based only on their gender or race or religion is stupid. Ms. Obama will be the next 2nd lady of the US. They will give her lessons to get rid of some of the ghetto talk, know what I'm sayin, so when her husband wins the presidency in 2016 she will be ready all polished and everything.
2007-09-14 07:29:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It doesn't matter, one Democrat is as bad as the other. Obama, Hillary, Biden, Kucinich, have I forgotten any? Oh yeah, the other communist icehole, John Edwards. Any of them would be a disaster for the United States. Support Al Qaeda and vote Democrat.
2007-09-14 15:45:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think too people are sick and tired of the same families running the country, its not supposed to be an aristocracy.
1988-1992 Bushies daddy
1992-2000 Hillary's old man
2000-2008 Bushie boy
2008-? Another Clinton?
whats next Jenna?
oyyyyy
2007-09-14 07:24:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I somewhat agree.
I'd like to see someone whose name isn't Bush or Clinton in the whitehouse.
I'm also not sure that a woman can win the presidency. Not that I think that women are incapable of handling the pressures of being president, but because I think a lot of Americans do think that.
2007-09-14 07:33:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by pastor of muppets 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Shes supporting her husband, you expect her to say her husband should not win the election, vote hillary?
I think this is just Obama's campaign manager talking. If a guy says that, he will be branded male-chauvinistic-pig, obviously he will do more damage to his campaign.
Its better for the comment to come from a woman, and none better than his wife.
2007-09-14 07:24:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by BrushPicks 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
My personal opinion is Mrs. Obama actually sounds more like a leader than her husband AND Hillary Clinton.
It took all of about 32 seconds for her to expose Hillary for the flake that she really is. That out-shined her husband by about two months worth of hearing his dribble.
2007-09-14 07:26:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
That's an interesting statement. She is right. It's not about who is next and if it is, we need to see the schedule because it's been stuck on old white guys for years.
Frankly I want to someone come in with some good ideas Not just the latest retread from years past.
2007-09-14 07:27:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Deep Thought 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think that the spouses of candidates for president should keep away from debates of any sort. You don't see Bill clinton talking about other candidates all he does is support his wife candidacy. Now that's class.
2007-09-14 07:36:24
·
answer #11
·
answered by caliguy_30 5
·
1⤊
0⤋