a debate with?
What would be the main topic(s) of interest?
2007-09-14 06:59:38 · 12 answers · asked by Mr. Perfect 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Also, why did you pick them?
2007-09-14 07:04:50 · update #1
Wow, there are so many. I'd probably choose either rmagedon or Earnest T 2.0. Both seem to be willing (and able) to debate intelligently without resorting to knee-jerk reactions. My main topics of debate would be government debt and the scope of Constitutionally-granted government power
2007-09-14 07:30:00 · answer #1 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Truthisback. While I don't agree with the conclusions he draws, I have to respect the fact that he isn't simply making it up as he goes along. He has data and statistics to support what he says. As I said, I don't always agree with how he interprets that data, at least he isn't just saying things like "Libs hate this country."
2007-09-14 14:17:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
truthisback
because he's not a raving lunatic, he is smart and i respect him, but i disagree almost all the time with what he says. he knows a lot about finance, more than me, and i think i'd like to discuss the economy and with him. once i claimed that the war economy was a big help to the DC suburbs lately and he said it was tax cuts and the stock market.
2007-09-14 14:09:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Chi Guy!
We disagree on just about everything, but we agree to disagree. No holds barred - we'd talk about whatever. I've emailed back and forth with him a few times - he's a really nice guy and very charming.
2007-09-14 14:28:45 · answer #4 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
B. J. Clinton or Ernest 2.0
BJ because his opinions are so different from mine I would like to know their foundations.
Ernest- because we differ on almost everything, but his opinions have backing and because he thinks he knows my views and doesn't. I think it would be fun to pick his mind and let him pick mine.
2007-09-14 14:09:10 · answer #5 · answered by Lisa M 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Anybody who argues for subjective morality or the need to not know the foundation of our objective morality.
2007-09-15 01:17:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
afro_justice_3000
Mainly because of what he just said.
Anyone else I'm afraid would be fun to debate with... But having a debate with a disparaging tool like him would be a hoot.
2007-09-14 14:19:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Fu Quan,
because he seems polite, and honest regardless of our difference in opinions.
I'd want to chat about his views on gay-marriage, abortion, death penalty, religion, etc... and anything he'd want to talk about as well.
2007-09-18 01:46:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Earnest, but he won't open the door to his bomb shelter in the Nevada desert. I would like to talk with him about the advantages of anti-anxiety medication.
2007-09-14 14:10:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
ndqbill
2007-09-14 14:25:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋