2007-09-14 06:13:51 · 14 answers · asked by Jason 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hell no. I wouldn't die to save anyone's legacy or to save face.
Theres too much death and innocent killings and maimings to justify war. Why, after Thousands of years and phenomenal advancements, haven't men figured out a way to solve problems instead of waging war? Are profits and spoils of war more important than the life of a human being?
2007-09-14 06:21:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
If I were in the military, (too old) I would sign up to avenge the deaths of those fellow Americans on 9/11/01. I would do it so my 9 year old son could grow up in a better, safer world. If my mission took me to Iraq, I would do whatever it took to accomplish that. It is not to save the president's legacy, It's for the 3000 that died that day. It's for my son. And don't give me the crap about Al Qaeda and Saddam not being linked. They were. And as far as a legacy goes, Bill Clinton is the only one I've heard batting that term around.
2007-09-14 14:17:01 · answer #2 · answered by rduke88 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
HI FRIEND,
I dont know why people are still moving here and there discussing so much about the greatest traitor of this century George W Bush!!!!!!!!!Eventually this is helping him to get much more media attraction throughout the world free of cost.In the name of Iraq War what he did in the past is a no more secret to any intellectual of today's world.A man who is talking too much about eradicating terrorism is indirectly giving much more attention for the proper nurturing of terrorism.Can you believe it???
But it is a million dollar truth.In the name of open fight against terrorism and Saddam Haeusen his army killed millions of innocent people who had no link with terrorism at all.The Bush admn was succesfull in dividing the people of Iraq into two religious groups which made it easy to create more problems in Iraq for Bush.
On the other side the family members of the innocent people who succumb to death by the Bush men joined different millitant groups only to take revange againt the Bush admn and U.S.A. This type of situation really enhances world terrorism to a great extent rather than demolish it forever.
As a tryst with destiny Bush is also started smelling his defeat in the next general elections inU.S.A. which may turn off the Bush's legacy forever.
2007-09-14 13:33:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Um no. I'd die in Iraq if it were making America safer. But since the general running the show doesn't know if America is safer because of the war in Iraq, I'd rather not die in vain.
I'm guessing if you asked IKE if WW2 made the US safer he'd have a very good answer for you.
2007-09-14 13:17:26 · answer #4 · answered by Franklin 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I would fight and die in Iraq to fight and die for my country. I could care less about your Afrostupidity and twists, you're still a coward.
2007-09-14 14:34:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mr. Bush does not care about a legacy. That has always been Clinton's bugaboo.
2007-09-14 13:18:58 · answer #6 · answered by regerugged 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
What legacy would that be? The legacy of ineptitude, shame, lies, and ignorance? Certainly not.
2007-09-14 13:22:38 · answer #7 · answered by Julie W 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No ! my son has already been there he is 19 was there for 9 months . now he has to go back will spend his 20th b-day in bagdad.
2007-09-14 13:24:53 · answer #8 · answered by Lola B 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
HELL NO!! Not for Oil and the made up reasons to bother those people. They have been fighting for thousands of years. WE SHOULD MIND OUR OWN BUSINESS and TAKE CARE OF OURSELVES-THE AMERICANS.
2007-09-14 13:25:03 · answer #9 · answered by Maggirl 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No. They have been killing each other for thousands of years and they will continue to.
2007-09-14 13:19:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋