English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

my sister and i were attacked on her property by her mothernlaw i had to lay on the ground and put the lady in a head lock so she would stop punching my sister who weighs 100 the mother in law weighs a good 200 my sister has a restraining order against the mother n law but when we went to the hearing she had the meanest attorney i cant afford an attorney any suggestions yes my sister did try to defend herself by scratching the lady my sister also has a sheet of paper with all the hair the lady ripped out of my sisters head any suggestions?

2007-09-14 05:59:57 · 6 answers · asked by ericaleigh 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

i guess my question is why does her monther n law need an attorney when only retraing order was filed no charges just restraing order the judge gave a temp order

2007-09-14 06:18:41 · update #1

yes the only reason why the mother n law got off my sister was because one of my sister 2 year old twins so the mothern law on top of her mother and i said look what your doing to her mother.

2007-09-14 06:20:38 · update #2

6 answers

From what you are asking, I can't tell if the judge has turned down the order or not? What is the status? It sounds like no reasonable judge would not grant the order.

2007-09-14 06:05:19 · answer #1 · answered by makeloans2 7 · 0 0

The fact she has an attorney should not concern you. The judge will decide on the facts of the case, not who has an attorney. Did anyone witness this confrontation? Judges normally give more credit to a "disinterested party", meaning someone not directly involved who has no interest in the outcome. If there were witnesses, make sure they show up. If not, keep an eye out for witnesses in the future.

2007-09-14 06:08:28 · answer #2 · answered by trooper3316 7 · 0 0

the general rule is no. a judge may not be able to turn down or reverse a previously issued restraining order. this applies to a lower court or any court of similar jurisdiction(scope of territory). however when there is a valid cause which before the eyes of the law is deemed a meritorious reason, a restraining order may be set aside and even permanently enjoined(prohibit) from being applied.

as i analyze your case, there seems to be a very valid reason for the issuance thereof. so i believe there is no cause for concern that it might be reversed or set aside.

goodluck and have faith that justice shall prevail.

2007-09-14 06:11:46 · answer #3 · answered by Kiete123 2 · 0 0

given which you would be able to practice reason to get one. it is no longer nicely worth suitable a restraining order. basically watch for yet another incident, call the law enforcement officers so which you have documentation, and attempt lower back.

2016-10-20 00:46:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A judge can suggest what he/she considers to be correct in his/her judgement according to the law! The incident you have narrated by the way is pretty interesting and intriguing!

2007-09-14 06:09:27 · answer #5 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0 0

Suggest you rephrase your post so it makes sense.

2007-09-14 06:07:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers