Well, when I used it since July, it's been 85-90% accurate for me. I'm putting some confidence in it.
2007-09-14 13:38:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It will depend on how and what you perceive as being accurate.
Almanacs in general will do just about as well as anyone trying to forecast the weather for a period that extends out more than a year in advance. Most of these forecasts (A forecast being nothing more than an opinion of future events.) are nothing more than a description of fluctuations within the range of "normal" values.
In the case of the farmers almanac, they will on occasion throw in a little detail that may or may not be accurate. These little details sometimes will be correct and the media loves it when it does.
2007-09-14 11:07:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Water 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Weather is very dynamic and is govened by many factors, these can change rapidly and as such it's only possible to predict the weather for a few days in advance.
Farmer's Almanacs, Old Moore's Almanacs and the like tend to take a historical average and then make forecasts based on that. It's not very accurate but it does give an indication as to the probable weather conditions.
2007-09-14 08:05:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Trevor 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I as quickly as study a rfile on the accuracy of the farmer's almanac, written by using a school pupil who majored in information and climatology. the tip grew to become into that the farmer's almanac is not extra precise than once you're making your individual wager.
2016-12-26 10:29:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Their predictions are more an average of recorded weather cycles than a flat prediction of which days are sunny and which days are wet.
2007-09-14 05:47:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋