English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The movie is terrible! One and Two were much better.

2007-09-14 05:29:36 · 2 answers · asked by Firelight 2 in Entertainment & Music Movies

2 answers

Most likely, stars Michael J. Fox, Geena Davis, and Hugh Laurie were not interested in a third film. They either had other projects, wanted more money, or thought the Stuart Little franchise should end with the second film. I have no idea why the movie studio would even bother to put out a third SL movie! I agree- it was awful!

2007-09-14 05:39:46 · answer #1 · answered by sloppyjo 7 · 1 0

Stuart Little 3

2016-10-01 07:38:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

stuart 3 completely animated: https://tinyurl.im/e/why-is-stuart-little-3-completely-animated

2015-05-14 17:27:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It was cheaper to animate the entire thing than try to CGI Stuart again.

2007-09-14 05:39:41 · answer #4 · answered by pipi08_2000 7 · 1 1

STUAR LITTLE 3 SUCKS

2015-05-03 06:09:02 · answer #5 · answered by Romis 1 · 0 0

really? i have to look it up to see.

2007-09-21 08:49:42 · answer #6 · answered by spicy n 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers