English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-14 05:24:49 · 15 answers · asked by Deke 5 in Entertainment & Music Music Rock and Pop

Obviously, I was so excited over this question, I typed "had" twice. Oy...

2007-09-14 05:28:12 · update #1

So, the consensus here is that Michael Jackson did. But, who gave the best argument as to why...?

2007-09-14 10:03:54 · update #2

15 answers

Micheal Jackson, hands down, Britney hasn't yet fondled little girls or hung her children over the hotel railing.

2007-09-14 05:29:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Michael Jackson is still a bigger fall. Although Britney is the worst in recent history.

2007-09-14 06:11:20 · answer #2 · answered by GK Dub 6 · 2 0

Michael Jackson far and away. He accomplished a lot more musically than Brit ever did. Plus, he was accused of felonies. Britney is just guilty of being a mental midget.

2007-09-14 06:00:49 · answer #3 · answered by Rckets 7 · 5 0

Michael Jackson literally did!! His body started falling apart because of all his unnecessary surgeries. Don't believe the B.S. of him having a skin disease. If he did, you'd think one of his siblings would also have the skin disease to. He also went wacky years ago with his fascination with Disney's Peter Pan. Look at his recent photos, he looks like a cross between Peter Pan & Skeletor (from He-Man).

As for Britney, she just finally realized that trying to copy an image that is twenty years older than you is a waste of time. FYI: She was trying to copy Madonna's 1980's image.

2007-09-14 05:41:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Michael Jackson, poor guy, he was caught in a huge sexual scandal, plus he achieved a stardom that Britney would never even dream of.

2007-09-14 06:54:11 · answer #5 · answered by Cat Stevens 6 · 2 1

It's gotta be Michael. Britney is more a product of a bored society and terrible judgement. Michael.... that dude is seriously messed up and in my opinion had further to fall in the first place.

2007-09-14 05:41:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 8 0

Britney because Michael at least had talent.

2007-09-14 07:21:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

britney spears....ppl have learned to deal with michael j....no matter the faults, ppl will see him as the all time pop star. on the other hand, britney, started out at 15...ppl were in love with her and couldnt wait for her to turn 18...now she's a young woman with children. i think she would do better if she grew up, and leave the short skirts and bras at home. its hard being a child star because when you get older, its hard to live up to other ppls expectations. no one stays a child forever.

2007-09-14 05:36:03 · answer #8 · answered by datchik 4 · 3 2

Michael Jackson he seemed to move purposely---

Whereas Britney seemed to be overwhelmed mentally....

2007-09-14 05:34:08 · answer #9 · answered by Sophie B 7 · 2 1

michael jackson, he went from the king of pop to the king of weirdness.

2007-09-14 05:34:51 · answer #10 · answered by nashvillekat 6 · 2 0

Michael Jackson. He has had so many plastic surgeries, it is freakish. Not to mention his out-there marriages to Lisa Marie Presley and Debbie Rowe, plus he has been accused of child molestation, the latest arrest grabbing headlines, plus he was dangling his baby out of a window.

Britney only married a scrub, shaved her head before entering rehab, and displayed shoddy parenting practices with her two children. I think it's clear who's been through more.

2007-09-14 05:34:38 · answer #11 · answered by Sharon Newman (YR) Must Die 7 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers