If Barry Bonds has an * next to his record then the New England (Cheating) Patriots should have an * next to their three very close superbowl games. Only 3 point victories while cheating = should have been losses for the cheaters. As a Cowboys fan I know what it means to truly be Superbowl CHAMPS and it just sickens me to see these disgrace of coaching in the greatest sport ever.
2007-09-14 04:56:10 · 7 answers · asked by Dennis H 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Honestly, it is hard to even compare Bonds with Belicheck. Before Bonds was suspected of using steroids (not saying he didn't, but its never been proven, even by the Feds. As you could see with Michael Vick, when they've got something, they come after you.), he was already a multiple time MVP, and considered one of the greatest players of his time. Bonds had proven himself. Belicheck was a big loser in Cleveland, running a Patriots team with a quarterback who was a backup to Brian Griese at the University of Michigan. All of a sudden, Belicheck is a genius, and Brady is the best QB of all time. If you add the facts that they were found to have cheated in the same way in Green Bay, and their best defensive players were on steroids, Belicheck definitely deserves all the suspicion as to the validity of his wins, much more than Bonds's home runs.
2007-09-17 08:50:27 · answer #1 · answered by jimi1974 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no proof whatsoever that this happened during the Superbowl. That is not to say they didn't, but until proof that it happened then is provided, then there is no reason to put an * next to anyone's name. What is more: I'd be willing to bet that the Pats are merely the first to get caught, not the first to do this. Who's to say the Cowboys didn't do the same thing in some way, shape, or form? Again, I'm not saying you are wrong, and I am not accusing the Cowboys of anything either. I'm just saying that this is not just a Pats thing, and there is no proof that this had any impact whatsoever on any Superbowls. Until there is proof, I'm not jumping to any conclusions. All that said, the Pats deserve what they get for the game they were caught for. They should forfeit it.
2007-09-14 05:05:43 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You can't prove they cheated in those superbowls!!!! How do you know the Boys did not cheap too. They all probably do, so lets put an * by all the superbowl winners. Get over it, it has been going on since the beginning and will continue, at least until teams have to start forfeiting games and coaches getting suspended.
2007-09-14 05:49:34 · answer #3 · answered by littledel 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Disagree...if it sickens you so much STOP WATCHING and find another sport...because everyone does it just ask Mangini(jets coach who turned in the Pats ) he said he knew they were taping cuz he hired the guy when he was with NE... and could you please send me some proof that Barry Bonds has an astric next to his name stop making comments that aren't true...
2007-09-14 05:12:10 · answer #4 · answered by daddio 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the cowboys and pats both suck but i agree they should put a * by there super bowl wins and they should fire the coach for letting that happen it sends wrong message to the children it OK to cheat if you don't get caught ( and the real super bowl champs are the Steelers)
2007-09-14 05:08:54 · answer #5 · answered by dave7632 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think your a complete idiot,agree or disagree.
2007-09-14 05:30:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=jc-historynflcheating&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
2007-09-14 06:20:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋