English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

NCAA's ruling that the school was guilty of a "failure to monitor" the employment of players and must erase eight football victories from the 2005 season.

Sooners are worst than LSU

Fight On!!

2007-09-14 03:47:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football (American)

Sooners are nothing but;

L O S E R S

Fight On!!! Fight On!! Fight On to Victory!!!

2007-09-14 03:48:42 · update #1

13 answers

What can you expect from the Sooners?

Did you know that a Sooner is someone who cheated in the race for land?

Figures.

2007-09-14 04:37:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Well, the NCAA gave the death penalty to SMU and after they crashed and burned the NCAA will never do that again. My understanding is that OU did it's own investigation and advised the NCAA of the problem and the actions taken by the Sooners.
It's hilarious that you as a USC fanatic is pointing the finger at anyone. At least OU took steps to clean their own house and did not sweep it under the rug like USC. I have to hand it to Reggie Bush in that the out-of-court settlement had to be a real piece of work and since the NCAA does not have subpoena powers no one knows what the settlement covered. Also, yeah right Joe McKnight didn't talk to Reggie Bush. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
USC is lower than whale dung and we all know where that lies.

Fight on Cheating Trojans! Fight on!

2007-09-14 04:25:32 · answer #2 · answered by Zinger 6 · 2 2

Yeah, two players got caught by the University (not the NCAA) and were immediately kicked off the team. That's so much worse than accepting over $75,000 from agents, or putting up players and players families in luxury apartments for free.
Actually, you asking this question confirms my theory that you are not a USC fan, but that you hate USC and are on here working hard to make USC the most hated team in College Football history. It's working.

2007-09-14 04:00:29 · answer #3 · answered by Captain Hammer 6 · 3 1

Oklahoma self reported and I think the punishment is excessive. If they had tried to hide it(which they did not) then I would have had to agree with the punishment. Personally, I think USC should be banned for them paying their players and hiding it. USC's probably has a bigger player payroll than most pro teams!!!!

2007-09-14 04:09:08 · answer #4 · answered by littledel 5 · 2 1

it's only because you despise the sooners that you think this. i don't like the sooners but they do normally have a few good games worthy of watching. i would be saying the same thing about notre dame or ohio state. and you might disagree with me on that. but bo i don't think any team should be permanently banned. thy should not be able to make bowl games for the next 5 years though. just like they do with ncaa basketball.

2007-09-14 03:56:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

I agree completely, and while were at it lets ban USC for buying Reggie Bush a house. No more Sooners, and no more Trojans hallelujah!!!!!!!!

2007-09-14 06:52:33 · answer #6 · answered by Phillip 2 · 0 2

So I guess by your account USC is done thanks to a guy named Reggie Bush. How many agents did he get to buy his parents houses again???

the only people USC will be fighting soon is NCAA investigators.

2007-09-14 04:02:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

OU are the worst cheaters in the NCAA. Why else would go many players choose to play in such a unremarkable setting ?

They even named a cheater for their mascot!

2007-09-14 03:52:55 · answer #8 · answered by Bryan D 2 · 1 4

don't forget the Tide had to forfeit some of their victories.

2007-09-14 03:56:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I agree

2007-09-14 04:05:52 · answer #10 · answered by paulcondo 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers