Just shows ta go ya, they are making some fat cash, if not they would retire like our dads at 55-60 and enjoy the rest of their days, corrupt bastages!!!
2007-09-14 03:38:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. yet greater importantly: is every person observing Buggs Bunny, or The Simpsons? ? ? How approximately Hogan's Heroes ? ? ? ? ! ! ! EDIT:---the difficulty right that's the way you asked this question that would not look pertinent to something. You supply no hyperlink. you do no longer clarify why every person ought to have any interest in some phantom concern , approximately which you supply no clue approximately this is relevance to this type. i presumed you have been a clever woman. What are you thinking. you ought to no longer assume a sturdy answer to a lame question.
2016-11-10 10:26:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's the fault of the voters But when they bring home the pork than they get voted in again>
2007-09-14 03:41:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by 45 auto 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Robert Bryd (WV-D)
Ted Stevens (AK-R)
Daniel Akaka (HI-D)
Daniel Inouye (HI-D)
Edward (Ted) Kennedy (MA-D)
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
2007-09-14 04:32:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by pisces02 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well you could blame the voters..but then how many poloticians that run for office realy young...with age comes experiance..with youth comes uncertanty..which do you the voter want in office...
zoom
2007-09-14 03:51:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
That is the voters fault not theirs.
2007-09-14 03:38:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
If they do the job right I don't care if their 110!
2007-09-14 04:14:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by 29 characters to work with...... 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah it is ridiculous, there should be term limits.
2007-09-14 03:44:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bleh! 6
·
1⤊
1⤋