That question was asked on MSNBC last night. I thought it was pretty interesting too.
Why hasn't she?
2007-09-14 03:18:25 · 5 answers · asked by Enigma 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Iraq, 2003 until now, has been considered the Secretary of Defense's turf, but now that things are less in flux and leaders have emerged to negotiate, it makes sense that the Secretary of State should take on a larger role...
Don't forget the distinguished Ryan Clark Crocker is now the US ambassador to Iraq. He has spent his adult life serving the US State Department in the Middle East.
2007-09-14 03:46:26 · answer #1 · answered by floatingbloatedcorpse 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Incompetence.
2007-09-14 10:23:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
That's what the United Nations is there for. Why is it our Sec. of State's responsibility?
2007-09-14 10:24:03 · answer #3 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Because Dick hasn't told her so.
And never will.
2007-09-14 10:30:29 · answer #4 · answered by hwan_tu 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thank you!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@
2007-09-14 10:23:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋