Or do they agree that a decorated General really 'betrayed' us?
2007-09-14 02:10:39 · 10 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
From their disgusting comments during the hearing, I would say the ad expressed their sentiments.
2007-09-14 02:16:40 · answer #1 · answered by regerugged 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Moveon.org has every right to express its views on the general’s statements. Generals have come and gone, telling us that we are making progress in Iraq, we are turning corners in Iraq, as Iraqis stand up we’ll stand down, and, now, the surge is working.
We’re still in Iraq, we haven’t made any progress, we haven’t turned any corners, the Iraqis are not standing up and the surge has not produced the political results it was implemented to produce. The generals can say what they want or what they are told to say but it’s the lives of our troops and it’s our money being spent by the billions on this useless war.
2007-09-14 02:23:56 · answer #2 · answered by tribeca_belle 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Try pointing out where moveon.org wasn't factual.
Petraeus is a stooge for the Bush administration who likes war to increase his prestige and it makes for more lucrative opporunities. Since Petreaus won;'t come within a mile an Iraqi IED, its other who bleed to give him decorations.
2007-09-14 02:47:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Im just a liberal 30 year old unelected guy disgusted with move on dot org, and think that no one should attack active duty military officers for testifying before congress
shame shame shame move on dot org
and yes, john kerry condemmed the ad, and did harry reid
2007-09-14 02:18:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'll come out on it:
its 100% FRIGGIN TRUE
is that what you meant?
if you define betrayal as going against the reigning government or the current administration, then no, Pet is probably the most loyal American in the northern hemisphere. if you define betrayal as going against the truth and the best interests of the nation and its people as a whole, then Pet may as well be a sock puppet for Bush. why is this not obvious? he is EMPLOYED by Bush, is it any coincidence that he echoed what Bush has said over the last 6 months almost VERBATIM?
2007-09-14 02:15:03 · answer #5 · answered by Free Radical 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
The current one sure has.
His name even rhymes with betray us.
2007-09-14 02:18:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I haven't heard any come out against it. The silence is deafening! But that shouldn't come as a shock to any clear thinking individual.
2007-09-14 02:18:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
...And here I thought all the dems were already out of the closet.
2007-09-14 02:24:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
he is nothing but a spin doctor
2007-09-14 02:24:42 · answer #9 · answered by canada1usa0 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No way.
2007-09-14 02:27:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋