2007-09-14 01:16:45 · 22 answers · asked by lynn o 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
would they have had time to dispose of a body and compose themselves enugh to go and continue dining with friends?or could she already have been killed and disposed of before they went out?did anyone else see maddie in the room during the evening?friends of the parents had supposedly checked on the kiddies but only by listening at the door,why?if the room was unlocked surley they would have took a peek as well.
2007-09-14 01:23:43 · update #1
Aphrojazz, making voluntary donations entitles you to nothing.
2007-09-15 12:56:13 · answer #1 · answered by Rachel 1 · 6⤊ 1⤋
It depends which story you want to believe. They've changed their story so many times, it's ridiculous and the media has not helped by reporting things that were not proven facts.
Maybe they read OJ's book, IF I DID IT and got some tips on how to screw up an investigation so bad that no one can make sense of it.
I am sick of hearing about Kate and Gerry, I want to know what officials are doing to find the poor little girl. Dead or Alive.
2007-09-21 05:23:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gerry looked in at 9 pm, Kate checked at 9.50, and, sure there had been an abduction, she left her remaining 2 babies and returned to the bar. they phoned SKY NEWS at 10.14 and the PJ at 10.40. they were asked by the woman upstairs if they wanted the Police calling at 10pm but refused, the manager eventually forced them to call the police at 10.40, after their friends and them had effectively trashed the apartment, destroying forensics, the twins slept through this.
2007-09-21 08:31:43 · answer #3 · answered by Eleanor T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question! that's what the police would like to know but the info has not been forthcoming, strangely enough??
more to the point...why would anyone's first reaction to their missing child be "they've taken her, they've taken her!"?
instead of "OMG I can't find such and such"..or words to that effect? lots of things do not add up with this and it's getting stranger everyday. I think its bad taste to set up a fund to pay the legal fees of potential perpetrators. How much of the fund money has gone on other missing children so far? that was one of the other reasons why it was set up too? Too many un-answered questions all round
2007-09-14 01:28:46 · answer #4 · answered by rottielover 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I like the way Gerry is now saying the "intruder" was probably in the room when he last checked and he would have been there for an hour. As if....
2007-09-21 20:24:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I enjoyed the debate and found them to be in good ratings with most people, they are doing their job although did you ever study politics. I am sure there is more things we have to do to stand beside these people. Before and after.
Its when you don't vote, is when we go unhurd.
2007-09-21 17:39:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not another McCann question. It will all come out in the wash
2007-09-21 04:53:26 · answer #7 · answered by Soup Dragon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Within 10 minutes Kate had run back to her husband, naturally, raised the alarm and was told by the hotel manager that the police had been called. However, he hadn't called them as the log records a 50 minute gap. That is the hotel managers fault, not the McCanns.
The police sent 2 beat cops round to check it out, and then the real PJ's tipped up at around 23.50hrs.
2007-09-14 01:21:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
a lot can happen in 4 hrs .time to cross the border and gone .cross to north africa.6pm to 10pm.
2007-09-19 23:07:09 · answer #9 · answered by country bumpkin [sheep nurse] 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is alleged the last public sighting of madeleine on 3 may was between 6-6:30pm that evening.
2007-09-14 01:32:51 · answer #10 · answered by daisy 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"they phoned SKY NEWS at 10.14 "
OMG! Is that really true?! It would never cross my mind to call a TV station half an hour after my child was missing.
This is weird.
2007-09-14 09:58:02 · answer #11 · answered by Lip R 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋