Check out these links.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoWCIFmlSgg&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sueAQB3fjqo&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYWIT9TSJPE&mode=related&search=
2007-09-13 20:34:03 · 17 answers · asked by iaskwhy2007 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
12 ton titanium engines do not "vaporize" no matter how fast it is going and what it hits!
And a "theory" is only a theory until you have enough evidence for it to be plausible or even probable and it is way past that stage, so i would not call it a theory.
the real "Theory" is the "official" story! and have you ever noticed that they call it a "story"????
Also, have you ever seen what happens to a plane when it hits light poles?????? Makes a big mess, and there were several poles hit before the pentagon.
And if the whole plane at the pentagon vaporized, where did the small turbine come from that did not fit the suggested plane that supposedly hit the pentagon? It should have vaporized also, right?
Read an email on this blog from a concerned citizen about Governments and fals flag operations!
http://stopmartiallaw.blogspot.com/
2007-09-13 21:09:02 · answer #1 · answered by jim c 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Just this week while watching a program designed to help folks like you . Yep a plane traveling at about 500mph at impact will leave only fragments behind . And btw , long before 9/11 and CT's there was a passenger jet that went down in the glades and there was almost nothing left of that plane either . So there you have it .
I do hope you can put this to rest .
2007-09-14 04:39:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but aluminum burns. The reason why crash investigations can be so hard to conduct is because often times, there is nothing left of the part of the plane that impacted with the ground, or the Pentagon, or the WTC.
If there were a National Dumb&ss Registry created, every last one of you 9/11 conspiracy theorists should be the very first people to be registered on it.
2007-09-14 04:12:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Never. But no 757 ever hit the pentagon! It was impossible, and the data from the flight recorder proved it!
And how can a plane "evaporate" but we find all the bodies, That defies ANY LOGIC!
The plane is 100 tons and is 1/2 football field long and in 6 years the FBI has not produced 1 picture of it though, they confisgated all the tape! Where is the tape?
2007-09-14 03:54:48 · answer #4 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Airplanes are made mostly of aluminum, which is very flammable... even steel will burn in an air crash, especially if the plane is full of fuel... most plane crashes happen at very low speed, on the runway... in such cases the plane will either be mostly intact or broken into large pieces... a plane crashing at 600mph will be busted to smithereens, and if it's full of fuel it will crash and burn...
2007-09-14 05:44:48 · answer #5 · answered by shroomigator 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe you should look a little harder
Hey Jim take a look here
Have you ever put an empty coke can on a camp fire and looked at it the next day ?
Wow it looks like foil now and that's just from the heat of a camp fire. Now crank it up about 10 times and you might get close to the heat in the WTC
2007-09-14 04:13:25 · answer #6 · answered by ULTRA150 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thankfully don't feel the need to obsessively watch planes crash. I have seen a controlled video, in which a 747 crashed into a concrete wall, and disintegrated. You do realize there are no Aliens in the fields of New Mexico, right?
2007-09-14 03:46:16 · answer #7 · answered by DOOM 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, I've seen this before. If you have time, check out this link.
http://www.regressiveantidote.net/Articles/What_Every_American_Should_Know_About_Iraq.html
It tells VOLUMES about Bush's eagerness to go to war. And, just for fun, take a look at this one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rRqeJcuK-A
Donald Rumsfield on Sept. 10, a day before the attacks. I'm not saying that his testimony here had anything to do with the timing of the attacks...but it sure is convienent.
2007-09-14 03:43:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I can't watch youtube, which flights are you refering to? Cause I can explain both to you, quite easily.
But, just ask yourself this also, how many other planes have ever slammed nose first into the ground going near the speed of sound, or another plane flying almost 500 mph into a reinforced concrete building? None, to my knowledge have ever crashed like that, before 9/11. So comparing previous plane crashes, low to the ground, at low speed is like comparing a automobile crash going 55 mph to a NASCAR crash going 175 mph.
But if you guys aren't interested in the real "truth", just ignore me. Facts won't change your minds.
2007-09-14 03:45:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Lynyrd Skynyrd?
2007-09-14 04:16:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋