NOT TRUE. Object of attention differs. If you were to write the two processes, as procedures, one would involve the instruction to direct attention on oneself, and the other would involve the instruction to direct attention elsewhere. So, "...is not different from..." in your question is false.
2007-09-13 20:23:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Theron Q. Ramacharaka Panchadasi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, it depends on how thoughts are perceived,since the recovery of individual signifies or manifiest the thoughts of himself for example thinking extraordinarily. since its a process but never has been the way, or else the occuring thoughts is an individual rejection when it happens of what you call, "thoughts about things other than you" in same manner an individual occurance gives the principle of what I introduce the "thinking hazard" since primary thought/s is an adequate convenience of process. To draw the independent mind from others.
2007-09-14 03:42:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Benito V 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that the subjective thought process is qualitatively different due to the attachment to self influencing the process heavily.
2007-09-14 03:19:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by small 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You hardly ever see yourself as others see you. With that in mind, would others see themselves as you do? While some can be their own critic, some never seem to see their own faults. I cannot agree or disagree.
2007-09-14 03:20:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are more critical while thinking about things other than yourself.
2007-09-14 03:24:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by yogeshwargarg 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is the same as this 'non-differentiation is process', false.
2007-09-14 22:10:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Psyengine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
here, take a hit, you have been working too hard.....
2007-09-14 03:18:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋