2007-09-13 17:01:39 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
The trial was O.J.'s $300 million debacle that paid for legal fees, political follies and racial pressure that got him set free. It's a no brainer that if tried today, given the lay knowlege we have on DNA not present back then--O.J. might not wriggle free as he's done.
All the proof/evidence needed to convict O.J. was right there in front of us; it's just the jurors were outright bamboozled by the defense. Here's your proof:
Take a pair of leather handgloves you know fit. Put on a pair of latex rubber gloves. Now, put those same fitting gloves on now. See the illusion??? The gloves now look like they don't fit!!! And if the gloves don't fit--you MUST accquit!!!
Another key piece of proof / evidence was in BOTH victims cleanly knifed stabs just above the Adam's apple and Juglar veins. The Adam's apple stab severs the victim's vocal chords, so they can't call out for help. And you know it takes less than six seconds to kill someone by a Juglar vein severence.
These are wounds likely made by U.S. Special Forces troops, trained in hand / hand combat--where knife play is involved. And if they're the first two executed stab wounds, they prove highly effective, as the case evidently became to be.
O.J. was involved with intense Special Forces training for an proposed major network TV show called "Frogs" ( I think that's what the show was supposed to be ).
O.J. escaped the death penalty / prison time. And aside from his behemoth Civil court award loss, perhaps living each day, knowing you really DID kill Nicole and Goldman, Jr.,--and your Judgement Day is well on the way--is punishment on Earth enough for this loser.
2007-09-14 18:23:50 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Wizard 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What was the police chase all about if he had nothing to hide? What about the DNA evidence? He had a jury of his peers, that's what the problem was. I'm sorry, but the race card was played in that trial and it was trump!
2007-09-14 01:45:47 · answer #2 · answered by gma 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This world is based on evidence, there is no such thing as proof. It's like me saying show me proof that Jesus existed, there is no hard proof. Or show me proof that neil armstrong walked on the moon. It could have been shot in a studio....it's all about evidence and what you personally believe.....
2007-09-14 01:03:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you honestly think anyone here has actual "proof" that OJ killed Nicole and her friend? Evidence is all anyone here, including me, can provide based on the televised trial and media. And that in my opinion was enough proof.
Sorry OJ. Errr, I mean j.b.
2007-09-14 02:55:25 · answer #4 · answered by CharJ, 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There was DNA evidence! The only reason he was acquitted was because people are stupid and didn't understand DNA, and were dazzled by Cochran's rhymes.
2007-09-14 00:24:26 · answer #5 · answered by anonymous 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are truly WEIRD, my friend.
You may have just asked the world's most ASININE question!
Congratulations.
2007-09-14 00:10:18 · answer #6 · answered by tiny pup 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I really don't think he did it. He knows who did it. That will be something I feel we will never know for sure.
2007-09-14 00:10:14 · answer #7 · answered by robee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋