Burning is a form of oxidation so it requires oxygen. I am not sure whether or not O can burn on its own. Water can be thought of as the ashes of "burning" H and OH.
Did a search: oxygen does NOT burn alone. Please see:
http://www.bookrags.com/research/oxygen/
2007-09-13 16:19:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Caninelegion 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Burning is the common term for oxidation, albeit at a fast rate. NO element can be oxidized by itself, but oxygen is NOT necessary for oxidation! Concurrent with an oxidation reaction is a reduction reaction, and they are normally known as redox reactions.
* Oxidation describes the loss of electrons by a molecule, atom or ion
* Reduction describes the gain of electrons by a molecule, atom or ion
Hydrogen can be oxidized by many chemicals, including chlorine, creating hydrogen chloride. The H2 "burns" in the Cl2, but MUST have an oxidizer to produce a redox reaction.
2007-09-13 16:20:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by xraytech 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dont listen to any of the other answers, they are wrong, to have combustion, you need a fuel source (hydrogen), an oxidizer (oxygen) and an ignition source, neither H or O would burn alone,
2007-09-13 16:31:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by vasilios s 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
oxygen burns alone; hydrogen needs oxygen to burn
EDIT- of course oxygen needs an ignition source...no one is suggesting that pure oxygen just sets itself off. fire is a process of oxidation- hydrogen, while HIGHLY combustible, needs oxygen to burn. pure oxygen and a spark equals a fireball- no hydrogen required
2007-09-13 16:09:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by dr schmitty 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, just a little fiery spark with a mixture of oxigen will enflame it
2007-09-13 16:11:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Zazzrix Zebriel 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, they require each other to combine and make the explosive energy.
2007-09-13 16:08:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by bravozulu 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i don't think either burn alone
2007-09-13 16:09:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by john77 2
·
0⤊
0⤋