English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-13 14:29:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

13 answers

Hello everyone.

I'm a soldier in the U.S. Army and have been for 3 and 1/2 yrs.
I re-enlisted for 5 more years while in Afghanistan and I'll end up with 8 total yrs. if I
don't re-up again. Anyways I wanted to tell you all the truth about
these so called troop reductions that are being talked about. Ever
wonder why the Government always says we are withdrawin so many
thousands of troops but somehow the troop level stays the same? It's
because they are lying to you and also telling you the truth at the
same time! Every time they say they are pulling out oh 5000 troops,
they do. What they don't put on the front page is that another 5000
troops are moving in to take their place. It's all part of the force
rotation. Don't let them fool you! If you truly want troop reductions
the look not only at how many troops are coming home, but how many are
leaving home as well. I and my unit are scheduled to go to Iraq later
this year...to replace those that are coming home which are part of the
current troop "reductions". Help us. WE ARE DYING FOR YOU!

2007-09-13 14:50:33 · answer #1 · answered by us_soldier_20 1 · 5 1

Against.

2007-09-13 14:32:54 · answer #2 · answered by That one 7 · 2 0

It's not "pole" - it's "poll".

And I'm forever against any war, conflict or battle which is initiated against an innocent party against whom such flimsy, fraudulent and moth-eaten "proof" was ever concocted!

GWB will go to his eventual grave with the blood of thousands of innocent Iraqi children on his hands and all of the profits from war weaponry & oil will not make his life easier.

2007-09-13 15:20:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

against, it ruins the economy, gets people killed, inconveniences everyone lives, and in the end all that's left is a big pile of rubble, and a sign saying "we win, good for us, now on to the mess." I mean what's the point of fighting, if we'er killink the people we, supposedly, went out to save.
P.S. twisted pink's answer sound's about right, and the war, to me, seems like an oil scam, but that's just me think about it, why else would the governmet go out of its way to help a third-world country for almost no reward, other than the one above.

2007-09-13 14:38:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I'm for taking responsibility for tearing up a country and falsely accusing there leader for wmds and all the Innocent lives lost we need to stay and protect the innocent children and show them we do have some honor and integrity

2007-09-13 19:56:46 · answer #5 · answered by dan m 6 · 0 0

Against from the start!!!

2007-09-13 14:59:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

First of all it isnt a war. It was a pre emptive attack on a sovereign nation. But that said, against it.
added: to US SOLDIER 20 God be with you and thank you for your truthful information.

2007-09-13 15:16:53 · answer #7 · answered by barthebear 7 · 2 1

against

2007-09-13 14:33:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

against it from the start

2007-09-13 14:54:15 · answer #9 · answered by Z 6 · 3 0

Which war?

2007-09-13 17:11:29 · answer #10 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers