I'm being quite serious about this question...
2007-09-13 13:31:44 · 21 answers · asked by BeautyBunny<3 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You would finally get a full and up close view of what Hell would look like.
2007-09-13 13:33:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You would still find yourself being ruled by who ever was the strongest or who ever had the most influence and money.
Plenty of movies have been made showing what happens when someone with money or power takes over a community or town. They are very close to being accurate.
2007-09-13 13:38:07 · answer #2 · answered by From Yours Trully 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No government and no rules: The country would pretty much be horrible. No cops to stop bad guys, people dying everywhere because it's not illegal to kill. Who would make all of the major decisions around there? Who would pay for food getting shipped over? No one because probably everyone would die because people would absolutely lose it....
That's what i think anyway :D
2007-09-13 13:36:38 · answer #3 · answered by Chantel C 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Anarchy... by definition... chaos... thugs and bullies would rule.. life would be difficult to impossible.... technology would disappear... the standard of living would make living in the Middle Ease look like living the high life.
2007-09-13 13:37:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anarchy. That's why they call a governmentless society that, because it would be pure choas, full inequality, an elite ruling calls, murder, human rights violations and greed. Just look at Africa. They are pretty close in most countries to anarchy.
2007-09-13 13:36:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's called Anarchy. One of the more famous anarchists in the history of America was Emma Goldman. She wrote a two-volume autobiography called "My Life". If you can find a copy it is one of the best cures for insomnia around.
2007-09-13 13:36:03 · answer #6 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think a good case study would be Somalia, in the absence of a government, people would try to form one. It is how humans operate: in groups. And there would likely be competing factions, resulting in violence and complete chaos.
2007-09-13 13:36:38 · answer #7 · answered by tarzanmanofthejungle 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Chaos until a sect with power takes over, probably a military general. Someone always takes over because of power, money and greed. It will then lead to a military state.
2007-09-13 13:36:40 · answer #8 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There would be chaos. It would be hell on earth. Everyone would kill each other, and we would all be dead in a short amount of time. It would be horrible suffering, and people would be suicidal just to get away from the chaos. I'm not kidding.
2007-09-13 13:35:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It would revert to survival of the fitest. Tribes would form and the leaders that were most powerful would rule.
2007-09-13 13:35:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
people would fear for they lives cause there is no government to protect them and gangs will be formed and there will be a high outbreak in crime and there will be a low ecomony and the country will be bankrupted
2016-03-16 09:55:30 · answer #11 · answered by saul 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋