YES, it COULD be possible.
"gravitationally collapsed" objects still require much more information to be fully understood, so denying the possibilities are silly.
we still don't even understand gravity
I believe gravity has gotten so strong that its compacted time and space in the center to the point where NORMAL physic and laws break down.
But whats happening on the quantum level?
Because of this, I believe worm holes CAN exist and still break "the 2nd law of thermodynamics"
In the quantum world the impossible is possible.
Take quantum tunneling for example
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunneling
Wormholes are "supposed" to be unstable and they are.
But only a small amount of time ans stability is needed to allow a suitable burst of particles to get out.
http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/schwwbig_gif.html
from
http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/schww.html
Of course any type of matter we know that was in the singularity would be "destroyed" or broken down into separated building blocks ---- particles, quarks, and strings for example.
These objects COULD possibly survive passing through a black hole on a quantum scale, and arrive via the Wormhole on the "other side" as a white hole AKA Big Bang
(WHs are only a theory right now, but so where blackholes)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hole
string theory also claims that blob like containers (called "membranes") float around inside of the 11th deminsion.
Inside of them are other dimensions, and sometimes they crash into each other and cause them to blast ripples of energy and mass into each other causing big bangs.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4183875433858020781&q=Parallel+Universes&total=1159&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=5
2007-09-13 17:49:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mercury 2010 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
There is certainly a singularity of some sort at the bottom of a black hole. The exact nature of what goes on in the heart of a singularity is pretty much wide open to speculation (and there have been plenty of those made over the years ☺).
The one thing that makes your speculation seem questionable (not wrong, just questionable) is that, if a singularity 'opens up' into some kind of 'other' universe, why does the black hole still appear to keep all of its mass? There are a couple of people who have suggested that a black hole has to have a 'dual' (which has been called a 'white hole') and there are a few websites that have articles on the subject (space.com has one).
HTH
Doug
2007-09-13 13:27:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by doug_donaghue 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually, yes, this can be done, and some cosmological theories posit this. Turn out, once matter disappears behind that event horizon, you can produce as much energy as you like as long as you balance it with negative energy (which I know sounds hokey but is possible within the confines of the event horizon) leaving the total mass of the black hole unchanged as seen from outside the event horizon. This concept is expanded upon in Lee Smolin's chapter "What Happened Before the Big Bang" in "Cosmic Horizons" published by the American Museum of Natural History.
While such suppositions are difficult to test and so place such discussions on the edge between science and speculative philosophy, there are some observational tests. Example: our universe permits the existence and also produces a lot of black holes: if one tweaks various fundamental physical constants too much, it becomes hard for black holes to form (for instance, if cloud collapse times become large because gravity is weaker or gases don't cool efficiently because the fine structure constant is too large, the universe's gas clouds never collapse into stars or galaxies). Since child universes will tend to have physical constants close to their parent universe, one would expect a selection for universes that can create more universes by making lots of black holes, so any universe created under this scenario would tend to be black hole prolific. In our sample size of one universe, we have one that is prolific.
2007-09-13 13:40:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mr. Quark 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. The Universe is truly actual a Friedmann answer to the Einstein field Equations. A Black hollow is a Schwarzschild answer. those 2 recommendations are actually distinctive: the Black hollow has each and all the mass at a singularity interior the midsection, while the Friedmann answer has the mass uniformly disbursed. there is not any thank you to coach one into the different.
2016-11-10 09:16:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by read 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both of them are called singularity. So an universe is created from a singularity. This sounds interesting.
But the physics is not the same. so the universe was created from one singularity, i.e; the Big Bang, but not the other singularity, the black hole.
2007-09-14 05:12:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by chanljkk 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
it seems this question shows up alot in here. some scientists used to think the each universe was the inside of a black hole, and that each blackhole in our univers has a mini universe inside of it.
but the simple answer to your question is:
mathematically, yes. scientifically, no.
its mathematically provable. but it defies several scientific laws, most notably the second law of thermodynamics.
2007-09-13 13:20:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's very possible. To me, black holes are the universes trash can, except black holes are like a hole in time and space.
2007-09-13 13:19:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
no
Your concept of what a black hole is, is based upon fantasy. Research what a black hole is without delving into some fictitional realm. A black hole is a STAR that has gravitationally collapsed. It is not a portal to another dimension. Enter a black hole and you die. New universes are not created out of black holes any more than they are created out of our Sun.
2007-09-13 13:17:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Troasa 7
·
1⤊
4⤋