English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think this shape of Globalization increase the distance between poor and rich countries and therefore will increase the violence in all over the world ..
what do you think?

2007-09-13 13:06:11 · 7 answers · asked by bokharaiian 2 in Social Science Economics

7 answers

When powerful nations want the resources or other countries they either conquer them or trade with them. Look at the level of violence between nations prior to globalization and compare it to the last 30 or 40 years. However with increasing trade there is more contact between cultures, so interpersonal or even small group violence (terrorism) increase. If you look at the growing prosperity of many poor or previously poor countries, such as China, India and South Korea, I don;t think the argument that there is an increasing distance between rich and poor countries, stands up. However there is an increasing distance between the rich and poor within countries that may lead to more violence.

2007-09-13 20:22:36 · answer #1 · answered by meg 7 · 0 0

Globalization removes boundaries making it possible to relate easily with people from all over the world. this in turn, makes the impact of violence felt globally. It does not increase violence in the world.

2007-09-13 13:38:40 · answer #2 · answered by acasol 1 · 0 0

No I think people overreact sometimes. Globalization is good because it contributes to economic growth in poorer countries. It creates jobs and helps people get out of poverty. Just look at the Dominican Republic. The GDP grew 10% last year.

2007-09-13 13:34:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market), do not actually work. Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.

Profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is pathological deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the population with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names and fake backgrounds).

Actual economics is the persons paying the monthly business loan payments of companies voting at work in order to control the property they are paying for.

Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and the criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.

Anti-democracy republicanism is the psychology of imaginary parents and false government.

2007-09-15 07:27:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i myself do no longer think of the criteria of interest you observed on television is the real difficulty. the real difficulty is that over the years, I even have in no way seen the information media interior the US, clarify what they have been demonstrating for or interview any between the demonstrators to describe their motives for the demonstration.while they do get one to describe their reason or objective this is quite often a university pupil that he or she in simple terms desperate to take part in it and had no expertise of the subject concerns in touch.What i'm getting at is why is the media no longer masking the two facets of the undertaking?

2016-12-13 08:28:17 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The more the world is united we wouldnt have wars anymore at least against humans- maybe if there are aliens we might start a galatic war.

2007-09-13 14:28:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the decrease in moral standards and increase in selfishness causes more problems.

2007-09-13 13:15:16 · answer #7 · answered by bugman 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers