Naturally, this is a situation of individual taste (no pun intended) and everyone will have their "druthers"...
sobeit...!
Whether for or against, the foreskin does serve a purpose and very few seem to realize it... For one thing, it is a protection for the very sensitive skin beneath. As well, it acts as a sleeve bearing during intercourse in order to reduce friction for the female when she is dry...especially after menopause...
The foul odour often mentioned is nothing more than a lack of cleanliness and this lack of cleanliness can cause various types of disease and infections...
Soooooo....... "UN-" is best and it does matter...!!!
2007-09-13 13:16:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by farplaces 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Circumcised!
2007-09-14 00:43:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by mrsalramey 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Circumcised.
2007-09-13 19:53:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
No it wouldn't really matter to be honest. But I think natural is great and don't know why you'd want any missing. It's not dirty and most men in the world are uncircumcised.
2007-09-14 05:28:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Circumcised. EWE.
You do mean the man right? HAAHAHA!
2007-09-13 19:55:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Snowflake 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
circumcised, it's like chicken the extra skin is simply unecessary lol ;-)
2007-09-13 19:55:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by * SeñørITA * 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
circumcised.
2007-09-13 19:56:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Exotic Pink 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
The all look the same when their erect.
Who cares...
2007-09-13 19:53:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, it reaaaaaaaaally doesn't matter.
2007-09-14 06:57:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by inka 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
OMG me & my best g/f argue about this ALL time...i say circum-...she likes all that nasty extra skin...ewww
2007-09-13 19:53:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Angelface 5
·
2⤊
3⤋