Last year, when they were in a slump, they fired their playcaller (a fossil whose ex-team they blew out in a Super Bowl) and finished pretty strong after that. Considering that Billick's offense can't even hold onto the football, shouldn't the Ravens just replace him with Rex Ryan, who is the coach of the real offense of the Ravens? Rex's defense does a much better job of moving the ball when they have it in their hands than Billick's incompetent offenses do anyway, so why not make him the new coach if Billick can't teach that offense how to hold onto a football?
2007-09-13 12:31:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Billick is the idiot who called a pass play on 3rd-and-1 with a lead in the 4th quarter. He definitely is to blame for the INT on that play. Run the football. It is better to win 20-19 than to lose 27-20 on a stupid playcall.
2007-09-13 12:54:35 · update #1
I say leave it as is. Give him a chance
2007-09-13 12:42:31 · answer #1 · answered by CareBear 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they only have been given out-schemed by way of the Miami offense. First replaced into that the Jets did no longer anticipate Chad Henne to be plenty a factor of the offense. additionally, while they run the wildcat, they oftentimes run the ball up the middle. surely, invoice Cowher wrote an editorial some weeks in the past approximately how he might end the wildcat, and he suggested that containment up the middle replaced into the main needed protection. yet, Miami stored working around the perimeters or perhaps threw in a halfback bypass. And, the Jets in simple terms did no longer be conscious of what to do with that. i will say this, too. while the Jets ran their very own version of the chop up wing (what Miami calls the wildcat), a Miami linebacker jumped the hollow and blew the play up for a 2 backyard loss. that would desire to have instructed the Jets' coaching team precisely the way you preserve that play. The Miami protection might have seen that play a million circumstances in prepare and that they might desire to have found out a thank you to preserve it by way of now. And, leaping the hollow seems to be the respond. yet, the Jets in simple terms stored letting the Dolphins march down the sphere with that play.
2016-12-13 08:27:07 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iam all for keeping Billick! how did that idiot ever win a superbowl? I figure as long as Baltimore keeps Billick they will always be a bunch of losers
2007-09-21 11:38:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wait, did I miss a play or two? Did Billick fumble?
2007-09-17 14:15:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They won't turn it over 6 times v.s the jets
so billick's job is safe
2007-09-13 14:32:23 · answer #5 · answered by Jamie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think a coach as much to do with a player holding on to the ball.I dont think calling a certain play will predict if a player will fumble the ball on that paticular play.I think if anything they should replace the person who is fumbling the ball and put someone in who will hold on to the ball.
2007-09-20 07:00:56 · answer #6 · answered by M!$F!RE 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Billick was good as HE thinks he is he would be an amazing coach. But he's not.
2007-09-13 16:54:26 · answer #7 · answered by stan l 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a Bengals fan and a lot of us were wondering why you guys were passing in that situation, especially when you had been having some success with the run.
2007-09-13 12:57:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
how could it possibly be the coaches fault that steve mcnair throws into coverage or that a player fumbles the ball. there are certain things coaches can be held accountable for but i dont think there is anyway that turnovers are one
2007-09-13 12:42:40 · answer #9 · answered by jesus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no with Dick Butkus
2007-09-18 16:30:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋