wouldn't he have said the hijackers were from Iraq instead of Saudi Arabia?
2007-09-13 09:03:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They all planned it. It was planned for years.
I've spent the last year linking everything together.
Do you remeber when Dad Bush came on TV back in 1991 .. to be exact September 11, 1991 ... EXACTLY 11 years before 9/11/01.
Hmm. OOOOoooh. And by the way, we're over their for OIL.
Operation Iraqi Liberation = OIL
They are bringing troops out of Iraq now .. where do you think they'll go? Iran!
I think we should now worry about WHY the Pentagon has a 3 days plan to bomb Iran :-/
2007-09-13 09:14:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Now I know that the person who asked this question is just joking around, so I just want to respond to the most recent answerer, who is... an idiot.
First of all, it's the Lusitania - not the Louisiana. Second of all, about 1100 died, not 2000. Third of all, the US didn't send anybody to die. The ship left from Europe heading TOWARDS America, not the other way around. Fourth of all, the Germans sent out a whole bunch of threats - the specific threat towards the Lusitania was only published in one newspaper, one week before the ship left. Certainly wouldn't have had a large effect on the amount of people on the ship. FIFTH of all, the Lusitania was not a legitimate military target. Rules of war state that the worst the Germans could have done would have been to board the boat and take people prisoner, perhaps taking the ship back to Germany as well. Certainly, nobody could have expected they'd actually try to sink the ship.
As for some girl in Kuwait... I have no idea what you're talking about. The world went to war with Iraq after Saddam invaded Kuwait. The US was allies with Kuwait, and by terms of that treaty was required to side with them once Saddam attacked. They had no choice. It had nothing to do with some girl who may or may not have been in Kuwait.
2007-09-13 09:30:20 · answer #2 · answered by Jeff W 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
we are in the Middle east spending our taxpayers money at an alarming rate. Sacrificing our young people to defend Arabic nations that are very, very wealthy. These nations all hate us & we are protecting them? These nations have money sticking out their ears. They are building super large & super high buildings.Their countries are ultra modern with an infrastructure that is 2 nd to no other nation on earth. The majority of their population live in a higher standard of living than 90% of the American people. For instance, next time you are watching TV & pictures are broadcast, look how many Mercedes Benz autos are drioving around. This was & is about oil & Iraq was the most vulnerable one for invasion with a large amount of oil. What followed after the invasion, the great "unite-er" didn't have the foggiest idea it was going to happen! 9/11 had nothing to do with the invasion of Iraq!
2007-09-13 09:38:21 · answer #3 · answered by peepers98 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fact - The government send knowingly 2000 people to death in the Louisiana, to convince the public to join WW1. The Kaiser had send Wilson a telegram, that he would torpedo the ship, because it had military equipment on board, which was true.
Fact - A Marketing Agency made a video for TV, with a 16 year old pretty girl from Kuwait, crying, that Saddam's troops took babies out of incubators in Hospitals in Kuwait, to convince the public, Saddam was the devil and we had to go to war (Iraq 1989). Later it was found out, the girl had never been to Kuwait and the story was bogus.
2007-09-13 09:22:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
all the conspracy theories, and the official story have holes in them.
What does Iraq have to do with 9-11 and if they were from Saudi Arabia how come we don't question Saudi Arabia at all?
2007-09-13 09:14:07 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe the Bushies planned 9/11 at all. I do believe they ignored all the warnings, including numerous pleas from Clinton administration experts, to pay more attention to Osama bin Laden. How Condoleezza Rice could announce the title of the 08/06/01 briefing with a straight face during her testimony is beyond me.
And did he ever admit 15 of the 19 were Saudi (the others were Pakistani)? I don't believe he ever willingly came out and said that.
2007-09-13 09:53:23 · answer #6 · answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush didn't plan 9-11, OBL did. Bush used the tragedy to scare people into attacking Iraq. Cheney lied and said Iraq was involved with AL-Q and the attack on 9-11.
It is sad and disgusting to see a US administration go out of their way to start a war.
2007-09-13 09:12:30 · answer #7 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋
He didn't plan 9/11 but he still wrong to go into Iraq especially when Al Qaeda is not in Iraq.
2007-09-13 09:10:51 · answer #8 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He needed an American base in Iraq for the other wars.
2007-09-13 09:21:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We can't even keep a phone surveilance progarm under wraps, there is no way in hell we would be able to keep 9-11 under wraps if it was planned by the US (which I do not think it was).
2007-09-13 09:10:37 · answer #10 · answered by The Patrioteer 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋