2007-09-13 07:57:59 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Please answer the question and please do not rant.
2007-09-13 07:58:23 · update #1
deejay d - torture camps?
2007-09-13 08:04:55 · update #2
adam33079 - The guilty party of Abu Gharid were convicted. I didn't see Bush in any pics, did you?
2007-09-13 08:27:19 · update #3
TD - Ever heard of a mistake? Look at what your party leaders said about Iraq... before they voted against it:
http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml
2007-09-13 08:28:55 · update #4
Fed Up American - Still fantasizing about me? Still wearing the umbrella for a hat?
Next time answer the question or just simply do not post to my questions. Sheesh!
2007-09-13 08:56:02 · update #5
To all of those that look at hurting poor little terrorists in interrogation, ask yourself something... why are you sympathizing them? There is STILL no evidence that ANY of you posted. I am no die hard Bush supporter, get that straight right now. There is also no proof that Bush told troops to "torture" these people. Where is your outrage for the televised beheadings these peace loving terrorists have done? Why don't you hold them accountable for torture?
2007-09-13 08:59:37 · update #6
moveon.org, liberal blogs, Michael Moore, and anyone else that's capable of brainwashing. :)
2007-09-13 08:03:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋
I love the "torture camps" answer. That's a good one. Besides the fact that those "torture camps" are used to interrogate terrorists, and are not actual "torture camps". But hey, when you're a liberal, who cares about little things like facts.
As for the oil, first I didn't know that was illegal, and two, even if it were, that is not why we are there. Proof in the opposite direction is overwhelming. You have none.
It's amazing how many people say that he should be in jail for war crimes, yet have NO IDEA what the definition of a war crime is, nor how the legal system for governments work. They just don't like Bush, so instead of being rational, they just blurt stuff out, thinking they sound intelligent.
2007-09-13 08:36:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
They have none just rants. If there were actual evidence then he would be in the Senate chamber undergoing impeachment proceedings!
No matter how much you or I want people to be reasonable they wont. They are fanatics who believe in a conspiracy theory that supports their hate Bush agenda. Had Bush been a democrat can you imagine the shift in thought on their part?
2007-09-13 18:11:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
through fact the Bush hater you look, try to be truly desperate and pissed off to ought to motel to willful lack of expertise and feeble spinning of the actuality. at the start maximum of your "lies" are completely bunk once you talk approximately the actuality of the concern. How can he have lied (meaning planned deception) if he grew to become into purely going by ability of the intel that grew to become into presented to him? And he wasn't the only one. each and all the democrats that voted for the conflict observed the comparable intel, each and all the european countries have been given the comparable intel. Even Saddam suggested he intentionally lie to the worldwide into thinking he nonetheless had WMD through fact he needed Iran to concern him. So once you are going to attempt Bush for "conflict crimes" you are able to as nicely try the completed eu Continent's leaders, and your Democratic acquaintances in Congress. i'm no longer overjoyed with Bush's overall performance interior the White domicile yet i do no longer motel to stupidity, manipulation of info, and willful lack of expertise such as you appear to be doing.
2016-11-10 08:31:45 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is Abu Ghraib enough evidence?
EDIT::: Did you ever see Hitler in any pics of Auschwitz. The buck stops with the commander in cheif. I wouldn't have brought it up if there wasn't clearly a wider problem with the US using torture under his administration.
EDIT 2::: And I can't fathom how it's ok to people that the US now holds POWs indeffinately without a trial, and "interogates" them with torture. Step aside from your support of Bush and ask yourself if that's really a good thing.
EDIT 3::: Why resort to accusations that we sympathize with terrorists per se. Perhaps we see them as human beings before terrorists. Even if they are terrorists, why stoop to their level? There is plenty of outrage here about beheadings and actions of terrorists, but the question was about Bush's war crimes.
2007-09-13 08:06:07 · answer #5 · answered by Incognito 5 · 0⤊ 6⤋
They have no evidence. One said it, the rest believe it and to people of that ilk that is all the evidence they need!
2007-09-13 08:06:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
That's easy, they believe he committed war crimes because he beat Gore in 2000 and he beat Kerry in 2004.
2007-09-13 08:03:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 3⤋
Creating false evidence to take our nation into war for the profit of the oil giants.
2007-09-13 08:05:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋
NONE. Their accusations are simply propaganda, and hate.
2007-09-13 08:25:41 · answer #9 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A lot of speculation, not much evidence.
2007-09-13 08:03:04 · answer #10 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
the only eveidence is made up he committed no crime
2007-09-13 08:29:42 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋