2007-09-13 07:43:33 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
President Bush isn't even articulate WITH a script.
2007-09-13 07:47:35 · answer #1 · answered by Beardog 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Difference is Bush can hold the line in Iraq, Hillary wants to build a Woodstock Museum thank you Mr. Hsu who got his money from the organizer of Woodstock 40 million. The fruit never falls far from the Trie when the Clintons are around. I was making a joke about Charlie Trie. Hillary can't decide what she feels about Iraq because she has so many sides and faces.
2007-09-13 08:12:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I havent seen Bush fake an accent or try to speak jive. I understand this type of speech would be "articulate" for you but I dont think most people were very impressed. Hope this helps...
2007-09-13 07:58:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush is not a speech giver, with or without a script. He has far to many pauses, he stumbles over words, over concepts, he often loses his place giving prepared speeches. His people must just cringe every time he is asked a question and must give a non-rehearsed answer. He doesn't think well on his feet. It seems his actual reading level is around 3rd grade
2007-09-13 07:57:55 · answer #4 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary. Geoge Bush is always taaaaak crap. He is the "commander guy" who is aaaaalways hellbent on using the saafistacated nukilar technaalagy.
His friend John Howard from Austria would agree with us. Afterall, Bush and Howard met at the OPEC some days back, remember?
LOOOL
2007-09-13 07:52:43 · answer #5 · answered by The ROCK 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I really think it's Bin Laden. He can go on for hours without looking at his notes. Very boring, but articulate, if it's articulation that is important.
2007-09-13 08:04:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton, of course.
That's like asking what the better movie is between Plan 9 from Outer Space and Citizen Kane.
2007-09-13 07:52:59 · answer #7 · answered by brian2412 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i could desire to think of them as interest applicants at an interview. enable's additionally think of their resumes are sparkling and we interviewers have no concept who they 'rather' are. Now what could we are saying approximately them whilst they could bypass away the room? George: He seems to be a down-to-earth guy, likeable, common to get alongside with, a collection participant. If our corporation could be in a no brainer corporation (e.g. FMCG, uncooked supplies, motor vehicle) and the overpowering majority of our purchasers men, we could hire him for revenues. If he proves himself, he could have the flair to grow to be head of revenues sometime. Hilary: She is objective-oriented, is accepted with what she needs and is working difficult to get there. a helpful talker, demands comprehend. top administration fabric, probable strategic progression, HR (or given her certainly historic past, criminal dept). If she proves herself she ought to grow to be CEO. *** George has already shown his revenues skills, hasn't he? The question now's if Hilary has shown herself sufficient to be promoted to CEO, or if there is not a greater useful candidate for that place.
2016-12-16 19:12:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have never liked Hillary, but after hearing her call General Petraeus a liar to his face, I have complete and utter disgust for her.
2007-09-13 07:54:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
When does Hillary Clinton ever speak unscripted? Even her answers are scripted.
2007-09-13 07:49:08 · answer #10 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋