English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why or Why not?

2007-09-13 06:55:57 · 29 answers · asked by Still Beautifully Conservative 5 in Politics & Government Politics

29 answers

I would need to know her stance on the ISSUES.
So I would not say definitely YES or NO at this point.
Same thing with Fred Thompson.

2007-09-13 07:01:01 · answer #1 · answered by Supercell 5 · 5 2

Yes! She's the smartest, most sensible woman in politics! I had wished she would run for president, so bad, but I also realize now is not the right time for her. Libs are so confused about the truth of Americas situation concerning terrorism, and the war in Iraq, she wouldn't have the chance of being elected, now. I love her, and everything she stands for so much, I have a pet named after her. Of course my son, and I call him Condi for short, lol. If I wanted to have great strength, fortitude, brains, intellect, and foresight, and had to choose the personality of any famous person, I would choose to have hers. I love her more than President Bush! In my opinion, this wonderful woman is the next Ronald Reagan, but will be even better for America, than even he was, and that's saying A LOT!

PS I am compelled to add, that Condoleeza Rice is more sensible, and stronger than ANY candidate running for President NOW!

2007-09-13 07:15:42 · answer #2 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 2 1

Of course. Shall we compare her qualifications against those of Hillary? She has served as a Vice Provost at Stanford University. She has a PhD. She has been the National Security Advisor. She is the Secretary of State. She is fluent, not just proficient, in French and Russian and is able to conduct research in slavic languages. She is a world class concert pianist. Plus, she is respected by heads of state all over the world.

Now we'll get to Hillary. Hillary is........Hillary. She is a fantastic fund raiser.
She is a junior senator. The one and only major project that she has overseen was Hillarycare, which was a collossal flop. Other than that, she is unqualified to lead.

2007-09-13 07:07:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

I have always believed that most woman wouldn't make good candidates for president. She is the exception. Nobody can say anything bad about her and be able to back it up with facts, although I am certain people will try. The libs managed to call General Petreus a traitor before they even heard his testimony.

2007-09-13 07:01:43 · answer #4 · answered by Rich people employ me 5 · 7 1

helpful, needless to say i ought to vote for her by way of reality i only think of of that she could make an excellant president. She has sturdy values and enormous relatives with diverse international places. She is only what the U. S. needs. a actual lady president.

2016-10-10 12:29:25 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'd be more excited about her running than I would be about the rest of the Republican slate as of today. Now, if Colin Powell ran, I'd volunteer to for his campaign.

2007-09-13 09:55:22 · answer #6 · answered by Deep Thought 5 · 0 0

No... she is an inept Secretary of State... It has nothing to do with her being black or being a woman. She speaks intelligently but there is no substance... the world community does not have a lot of respect for her. She is a so-called expert in Russian afairs and our relations with Putin are fractured at best. Cheney talks more about Iraq than she does. The Middle East has actually gone from bad to worst under her watch.

I could go on and on but what's the point.... Even the NFL wouldn't let her be commissioner (her dream job... what kind of person in her position would say something like that??? Is she 8?)

2007-09-13 07:03:40 · answer #7 · answered by cattledog 7 · 0 6

Being fully Conservative, i would, why is? She is smarter than most , good back ground in politics and a good skills with the other countries. Tough on terror and would stay with the tax cuts that have help prosper the U.S.

2007-09-13 07:03:17 · answer #8 · answered by tzimmer44 4 · 4 1

I wouldn't hesitate, well maybe if she had a bad VP, I'd hesitate for a second or two. She is smart, articulate, savvy with international affairs, knows right from wrong. Heck she even likes football, not that its necessary for a President but it just make me like her more.

2007-09-13 07:02:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

Most definitely. She is a very intelligent woman.. And would put Hillary to shame.

2007-09-13 07:10:48 · answer #10 · answered by Freethinker 3 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers