Liberals want rapists to live next to you and your children, are we surprised?

Question

As if it's any wonder that a NAMBLA Member and child rapist lefty flagged this question immediately....once again.

LIberal policies let rapists out of jail early for "good behavior". An insane group called "Human rights watch" wants rapists of chldren to have riiiiiiiiights without the hinderance of having to register and rapists and allow people to know who is living next to them!!!!
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SEX_OFFENDER_LAWS?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US
NEW YORK (AP) -- Many state laws targeting convicted sex offenders violate the rights of people who pose little risk, a leading human rights group said Wednesday. It called for repeal of laws restricting where these ex-offenders can live and for curbs on access to online registries.

Human Rights Watch depicted its report, two years in the making, as the first comprehensive study of sex-offender policies in the United States. It said many of the laws are of questionable value in protecting children from sex crimes.

Answer 1

convicted child sex offenders are beyond help and should be castrated and hung from the highest tree.

Answer 2

One of the main purposes of the prison system is to remove dangerous persons from society. Once the convicted person's sentence has been completed and all other requirements have been met (parole, community service, etc.), the person is considered to be rehabilitated and no longer a threat to society.

If a sex offender is to be considered dangerous for the rest of his/her life, he/she should not be allowed to leave prison. Once he/she is released, it is a violation of his/her rights of privacy to disclose personal information to the general public. The sex offender list functions quite similarly to the scarlet letter. It continues to punish people who have already met the requirements for the terms of their punishment. It is something I personally view as cruel and unusual punishment.

If I have a one night stand with a woman who later cries rape, I will then become a "sex offender" and be looped into a category with actual rapists and child molestors. The category is too broad and mislabels way too many people.

If you have a problem with the fact that a sex offender can live next door to you, the problem is not your limited access to his personal information. The problem is that our criminal justice system allowed a dangerous person to leave the prison system and go back out into society.

Stop fighting the symptoms and instead focus on the cause of the problem.

Answer 3

1) You need to do more research and stop flying off the handle. many sex offender tags are questionable( 16 year old girl and 21 year old boy for example ) . For serious sex offenders no one advocates allowing people to roam about unregistered. By the way, in this country a registered sex offender can live in most neighborhoods of their choice already once out of incarceration with some states putting restrictions on pedophiles living near schools, etc.

Answer 4

Don't blame it on the Democrats, Bush and the Republican run Senate and Congress ( although the Democrats have a majority in Congress it isn't enough with Cheney's over riding vote) have had 7 years to fix this problem. Do you really think Bush and all his rich friends with their body guards and expensive compounds care one bit if you live next to a child rapist, Mexican illegals or any other criminal?

Answer 5

baby rapists shouldn't in any respect get out of reformatory. The recidivism is approximately 80 p.c., because of the fact of this except he's merely too previous to stroll, he will probably do it returned. i do no longer think of they ought to be placed to loss of existence, even with the shown fact that. i think of they ought to be put in the final inhabitants of a severe secure practices reformatory and all the inmates ought to be counseled what they did. Then they are going to go through the baby's destiny for something of their lives.

Answer 6

I find this part interesting:

""The residency law doesn't have any tie to safety," said Polk County Attorney John Sarcone. "They passed it with good intentions, but the reality is the vast majority of assaults against children occur from someone they know."

Sarcone, based in Des Moines, said the law has backfired by forcing sex offenders to move out of their homes, sometimes living under bridges or in rest stops where it becomes more difficult for authorities to monitor them.

"There are some horrendous crimes perpetrated against kids, and we want to protect them," Sarcone said. "But this 2,000-foot rule is not protection for kids. It protects politicians.""

These laws have not stopped anyone from being victimized.

Answer 7

sex offenses comprise a wide range of offenses. rape a 5 year old or smack a co-workers @ss and suddenly you are likely to be lumped into the same category together. this is not just. although both are wrong, there should be a distinction as to whom gets stigmatized their entire life, if at all.

by the way you might call me a "liberal". i don't really care. and no, i don't want rapists living next to me. better you than me.

Answer 8

What e-mail said. I agree with him 100%!!!! Wouldn't do for me to be in charge. Those kinds of people wouldn't be in jail, they would be 6 ft. under.

Answer 9

There are groups out there that want those things to happen. But not all Liberals feel that way. There is definite fault in your logic.

Answer 10

some political parties want diaper wearing prostitute users to live next you and stay in office.