or "oh yeh well but why didnt you say anything when they did it too?" or "if they can do it the why cant we?" Every answer is just a question as to something that someone else did. It never answers the question at hand.
2007-09-13 06:00:44 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
kyle...are you my doppelganger?
2007-09-13 06:09:28 · update #1
Dem -Larry Craig is a water-closet homosexual.
Con- Well Barney Franks likes young boys too!
Dem - Rudy Gulianni is a poor example of a faithful husband.
Con - Kinda like Bill Clinton and the red dress huh?
Dem - What's the story with Mark Foley and those pages?
Con - Well YOU people reelected Stubbs to office SEVEN TIMES!
Dem - Bush cherrypicked the Iraq evidence to support his push to attack Saddam
Con - Well, the Dems saw the same evidence and voted to go to war!
Dem - Bush should have paid a little more attention to his PDBs. Especially one entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike the US"
Con - Well, Clinton should have not bombed an aspirine factory!
2007-09-13 06:24:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
So what your saying is that your a conservative. "every conservative answer to everything" makes your case I guess. It's alright to be conservative, you can admit it.
So I guess to answer your "question at hand" ...... yes I have noticed.
But then that would make me liberal because I answered your questioned at hand, when I am a conservative which would then disprove your assumption. Which in turn would mean that my assumption of you being a conservative is wrong so that would make you a liberal doing what you claim conservatives do. Wow, You actually proved that A liberal does this too, I wonder if any more liberals "do it".
2007-09-13 13:22:59 · answer #2 · answered by libsticker 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes most six year olds I know act the same except most of them sometimes see they were wrong,admit they made a mistake and mature.Usually they grow up and by the age of ten they are more reasonable.
Some of those six year olds however never learn.
2007-09-13 13:37:53 · answer #3 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Little boy you should study your history before you make any statements about it. You also have to pay attention to the game before you can call a hit or a strike, a ball or foul.
Where's the context of your examples? I listen to more sound bites a day than you hear in a month of Sundays and what you say is totally false.
2007-09-13 13:10:45 · answer #4 · answered by Barney 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes. I also love it when they trash the New York Times then turn around and quote from it when it agrees with the con position.
2007-09-13 13:10:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
That's all they got. Sad really.
2007-09-13 13:09:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You make absolutely no sense.
2007-09-13 13:07:07 · answer #7 · answered by kyle 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋