English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or should we wait until after Hillary serves 8 years as president and put her on the $1.00 bill?

2007-09-13 04:51:53 · 34 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6 in Politics & Government Politics

34 answers

Why not? He was a good president and if hillary did well on her 8 years terms, then let her be.

For once we have a picture of a woman on our bills which is significant because it shows how much our society has progressed compared to the rest of the world especially, middle east.

2007-09-13 05:06:57 · answer #1 · answered by BrushPicks 5 · 2 0

I think a lot of Bill clinton, through his works and Clinton foundation, this less than perfect man (as we all are less than perfect), lives a life of Christian Charity and caring that is like the one Jesus taught about. The Rev. Billy Graham admires him greatly and has said he lives the life and walks the walk.

I thin Senator Clinton will be a great President too, but it is too soon for either to be honored in that way and generally that does not happen while they are living. I think Washington will always be on the dollar bill represent 1 as the first President (He cheated on Martha quite a bit too).

Maybe the $10 bill or some coins someday.

These two really do live a charitable life.

clinton lied about his affair, which is none of our business anyway, it is not like he was the first. He DID NOT lie about an uneccessary war or pervert privacy through the mis-named Patriot Act, but Geo. W. sure has.

Blindly following a bad leader is NOT patriotism.

Braxton: Please! Clinton's medical record are in the National archive and he does not have Herpes, but what if he did, it happens. Do a body count search for any president, numbers will be similar, people die. i don't think any president has ever had that done. I lived in Arkansas when he was governor and the poverty rate declined and he built great highways, which now need re-built and I don't see Huckabee doing anything about it. I don't remember one rumour about prostitutes and Clinton and what proof, actual proof do you have that his wife and daughter are lesbians. Because they are strong, smart and independent? Sounds like my wife and daughter and they aren't, but again what if she is? The VP's daughter is an open lesbian, remember? And a Republican!!! Oh my God!

there is no basis for these accusations. People sin and make mistakes and real Christians forgive, most others do too.

Billy Graham admires Bill Clinton, greatly!

2007-09-13 05:01:33 · answer #2 · answered by rumbler_12 7 · 1 0

I think presidents should never be pictured on currency until after their death. It's too tough to truly evaluate someone's legacy while they are still alive.

For example, the Clintons were already involved in the Watergate scandal. What if something worse were to happen? Then we would have a national embarrassment as the person pictured on our currency was involved in a scandal. We would be recalling the printed bank notes, and it would be a mess.

On the other hand, it's much easier to look at the legacies of people like George Washington or Abraham Lincoln. Their life accomplishments are already complete and we can look at them objectively. Perhaps after the Clintons have passed away, the country will look back at their legacy and decide to honor their memory with a picture on a bill.

That said, I don't think either of them is worthy yet of belonging on US currency. I have high hopes for what they may yet accomplish, but I can think of other historical presidents who are more deserving right now.

2007-09-13 04:59:52 · answer #3 · answered by JimmyNeutron85 2 · 2 0

And replace George Washington? What in the world are you thinking. And WHY in the heck would you want to "honor" Bill Clinton. I really hope you are being sarcastic :P

Clinton doesnt deserve do be on ANY currency of ours. Lets put him on another countries currency that would be funny. Too bad you can't do that :) And actually Alexander Hamilton was a great man. Jefferson did do some important things for our country such as writing the Declaration of Independence not THAT big of a deal :P hehe um but yeah I do agree Jeffereson was a jerk or so I have read in a few books lately.


And I agree with what that guy said about Abe. As my mom always said "Lincoln set free the little black slaves not the little white ones."

2007-09-13 04:56:11 · answer #4 · answered by gotconverse1990 1 · 2 2

You want to put the picture of Bill Clinton on a 1 dollar bill. An impeached president that had Bin Laden for the taking during his tenure and one that completely debased the military in it's budget cuts. Oh lets not forget about the Monica saga and his continual disrespect to the american public with his denials of the incident.
On the other hand George Washington really didn't do much did he?

2007-09-13 04:59:49 · answer #5 · answered by TanTom 3 · 1 3

Clinton became in common terms a great negotiator, I mean think of roughly it he lied to a grand jury and senate investigating committee, and have been given away with one million) expenses on rape, 2) expenses of sexual harassment, 3) perjury, (of direction this became not the 1st time he or, Hillary, had gotten away with mendacity) 4) a divorce, ( now what's up with that, If I did that my spouse could slap divorce papers on me so quickly, and he or she could own each and every thing I had. Hillary is a looser, or wait, perhaps she became doing a splash guy or gay ???too !! and could not open her huge capture) any way you positioned it, i don't think of that any president can end poverty, welfare, finished well-being care, unlawful immigration, or the rest as far as this is worried, via fact that's not on the time table of the CFR, (council of foreign places family) and Builderberger Boy's, or the ecu Commonwealth application, in any different case customary via fact the single international ORDER. we could desire to comprehend additionally that," WE the folk", have enable the powers of government do what they like fairly of what we could like, if we don't get up we can unfastened this u . s . all too quickly.

2016-12-16 19:06:14 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Definitely need to modernize the currency, put on the recent presidents Nixon, Reagan, JFK, Clinton etc

2007-09-13 05:02:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

You know, I voted for him twice, & would yet again, & thought he did a reasonably good job. I think he did lots better than people give him credit for. But, he was/is a trouser snake, & I don't think anyone of the last part & this century so far deserves to replace Washington.

2007-09-13 05:13:39 · answer #8 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 1 0

Replace George Washington with one of the Clintons on the $1.00 bill? Wow, that would be an insult of everything this country stands for. So in my words. Not a chance in hell.

2007-09-13 04:55:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Absolutely not, the Clinton's are both crooks. At least the Presidents on our current currency all did wonderful things for this country.

2007-09-13 04:56:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers