When it's a Democrat, they claim it's a "privacy" issue.
When it's a Republican, they pick it apart.
Clinton was just as hypocritical as Craig. Clinton claimed to be in favor of women's rights, yet he sexually harassed employees, possibly raped a woman, and even treated Monica like a "plaything" rather than like a person. (People also don't remember the months and months of Clinton's team trashing her and calling her crazy a liar, etc.) Some standard of behavior for women's rights advocates to look up to!
And I didn't even get to the felonies yet . . .
:)
2007-09-13 04:58:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
You do could desire to seem into a number of those products your self. do not in common terms settle for what you have been informed or what you examine on a non secular or an quite conservative internet internet site or Fox information. there's a great style of incorrect information available, and you will not get the completed tale from a partisan coaching source. bill and Hillary have been matters of continuous harassment via Republicans. Why do I say harassment? via fact after six years of investigations, they could not even charge him with something different than the lie approximately Monica. those investigations have been performed at taxpayer rate and value hundreds and hundreds of greenbacks. the main advantageous, maximum able attorneys have been used via the Republicans. countless the statements on your record are rather all on the subject of the Monica affair, and others are only not real. All of those are real, and all are a results of bill's lie on the subject of the Monica affair. the only president ever impeached on grounds of non-public malfeasance - First president sued for sexual harassment. - First president to verify a criminal protection fund. - First president disbarred from the U. S. suited court docket and a state court docket those relax of the statements on your record at the instant are not real, or they comprise important distortions.
2016-12-16 19:04:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
One reason that might make some even angrier now would be that Newt Gingrich, who was leading the way as Speaker of the House, was simply running a smear campaign while having an affair himself. It makes people's stomachs turn to even think of the arrogant hypocrisy. The impeachment wasn't warranted and was an abuse of power by the Republicans. But we know how Newt has been forgiven for his transgression by conservatives but Bill is still evil incarnate. What a sham.
2007-09-13 05:08:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sketch 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
It's just boring. It's ten years ago. Nobody cares. All the jokes are played out.
Cons tried desperately to turn his sex life into some sort of issue with political traction, but it blew up spectacularly in your faces. His approval rating went way up after the impeachment, and is still over twice what Bush's is.
The whole thing got even more laughable when we learned that several Repub pols who blasted Clinton at the time (Gingrich, Hyde, Vitter) have been sodom and gomorrizing their way through their entire adult lives. Not to mention Foley and Craig. The whole thing has made the Republican party look like a spectacular buffoon.
Maybe you're the type who likes to watch endless documentaries about Princess' Diana's death. That was ten years ago too.
Why do conservatives obsess endlessly about Bubba's peccadillos and all of the details? You also seem particularly fascinated by a certain common sex act, maybe because you've never actually had one yourselves?
2007-09-13 04:37:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by celticexpress 4
·
4⤊
5⤋
Whenever there is a dreadful scandal in the Bush/Cheney administration. Many drag this old stuff out. Like it is an excuse for bad behavior for your party. Like it is an excuse for all the lives this administration have taken. We don't get angry just sick that you are so gullible and desperate. We want better for you. A stain on a dress is not comparable.
2007-09-13 04:39:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by gone 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
We dont' get angry we just laugh at how ridiculous the whole thing was. They tried to impeach a president for lying about a sexual transgression that had nothing to do with his job as President of the United Sates.
2007-09-13 04:37:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Spirish_1 5
·
5⤊
4⤋
A sick and sexual deviant for getting a bj? Wow you jsut called 99% of the adult male population sexual deviants. At least Monica was a girl, and he didn't get it in a mens bathroom.
Guilian Cheated on All of his wives, including the last one while she was sick and even moved her out of the Governors mansion to move his mistress in. Newt admitteed to doing the same while he was screeming abotu how immoral Clinton was. its pretty funny how bad the Repubs looked in it all actually. Aren't you glad that over 10 million of tax payers money was spent by the Repubs to investigate the Pres Cheating on his wife.
2007-09-13 04:37:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Myles D 6
·
4⤊
5⤋
I'm a liberal but no great fan of Clinton. He was a much better president than the idiot we have now though. You seem kinda funny to me I haven't answered any of your previous questions but it's funny how fascinated by Clinton and sex you seem to be with your questions. I'm guessing you're just another conservative perv that loves sex but feels guilty about it. don't worry I won't tell on you.
2007-09-13 04:47:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by discombobulated 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
It was a red dress, and, frankly I am far more interested in my own sex life than in Bill Clinton's. Remember mate, Guliani, McCain, and Thompson all committed adultery, he who lives in glass houses...
2007-09-13 04:33:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by alphabetsoup2 5
·
7⤊
4⤋
Because it seems petty compared to what is happening now with this President.
2007-09-13 05:00:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by midnight&moonlight'smom 4
·
2⤊
3⤋