Not a real head line YET but the Blame Bush for EVERYTHING organization is sure to find a way to make the White House responsible. What do you think ROFLMAO
Ohhh and Al (the tree) Gore says this is more proof of global warming.
2007-09-13 03:35:55 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ahh but Mitchell I'm just doing the same thing as Moveon.org and the Democratic Party does i.e. invent nonsense. If it's ok for them to do it then logically it must be ok for others to do it.
2007-09-13 03:46:26 · update #1
Love it !!! Looks like I struck a nerve with the whiney assed liberals. BTW you MORONS I'm not a big Bush supporter, however I will take him over Gore or Kerry anyday of the weeki.
2007-09-13 04:07:20 · update #2
oh, of course he knew about it. He actually created the storm using technology from Area 51 and caused the storm to hit Texas -- notice, when he wasn't there. Very suspicious indeed. And with the help of funds funneled through Haliburton, he was able to dupe us all into believing he had nothing to do with it. He is so evil and conspiratorial minded. Doesn't he know we see through all that!! :)
2007-09-13 03:45:03 · answer #1 · answered by Wayne G 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
After Katrina:
The pop-science community said that there would no doubt be more and stronger hurricanes hitting the US mainland due to the irresponsible policy that led to Bush not signing the Kyoto confusion.
Item one: Stronger hurricanes?
Katrina was a CAT 5 Hurricane. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CAT 6. Unless the globe got larger and more dense with wider oceans the next day, it is just not possible.
Item two: More hurricanes? Since Katrina, not one single hurricane has made land fall in the US until Humberto. Humberto met the criteria for a hurricane over a tropical storm by just 6 MPH, that lasted for less than an hour and those were not sustained winds.
2007-09-13 04:01:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Preposterous!!! I know it is hard to take when the person you support so avidly is such a yutz. He is incompetent, a liar, and is surrounded by corruption and people simply point this out. Perhaps too much but if he had it together they would praise not criticize. How would Bush know the hurricane was coming unless he really does talk to God and God told Dubya that it is on its way and to batten down the hatches at the ranch.
The White House would not, of course, be responsible for the hurricane as it has never been responsible for any other hurricane. (They don't take responsibility for anything no matter what) but they do have responsibility for what happens to AMERICANS after the storm. They failed miserably after Katrina. Did they learn from Katrina? We shall see.
Bush wants to run the country as if he is a CEO of a corporation. The CEO is held accountable for EVERYTHING that goes on in his company whether directly responsible or not. Whatever happens in the aftermath of Humberto he will have to be accountable for. Will he or those in his (company) government make the right choices? We'll see.
2007-09-13 03:56:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
i like it!! The church is in an quite fragile situation. i contemplate whether they actually have a clue... Why won't be able to they be solid associates? it is in comparison to all people who is going right into a bar is a few demonic psychopath. and of direction, not truthfully everybody who enters the church is all that holy the two. I consistently concept human beings went to church via fact they needed help interior the self-progression section. properly, i assume we can kiss the solid neighbor concept so long now.
2016-12-16 19:03:40 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't have a witty comment, but your question is stinking hysterical! Thank you for a great laugh!!!!!! Have a wonderful day!
2007-09-13 07:37:50 · answer #5 · answered by Tink 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are you making things up in order to bash Bush critics? Bush has done enough on his own to justify valid criticism of his administration’s policies.
No one has to fabricate reasons to criticize Bush and you shouldn’t unjustly accuse them of doing that.
2007-09-13 03:44:50 · answer #6 · answered by quest for truth gal 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
is that like Katrina....when everyone blamed bush that the storm was so big...it was all his fault he must have paid mother nature off.....lol.....
global warming: the earth moves in cycles....werent they saying in the 70s that the earth was headed for another ice age?
2007-09-13 03:43:28 · answer #7 · answered by tll 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Pretty pathetic when you have to make up headlines that don't exist. Focus on the crimes and lies of Bush before you start blaming others.
2007-09-13 03:41:51 · answer #8 · answered by kenny J 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Mr Enviroment (who bleeds more money by accident that most of us will earn in a lifetime) will say anything to further his carbon credit scam.
2007-09-13 03:41:46 · answer #9 · answered by credo quia est absurdum 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Bush isn't blamed for everything, just the things that he is responsible for. That's bad enough, you don't have to invent more things.
2007-09-13 03:40:33 · answer #10 · answered by Mitchell . 5 · 5⤊ 5⤋