This article compares them:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp
President Bush's house is extremely eco-friendly, while Gore's mansion uses 12 times as much electricity as an average house in Nashville.
Gore talks cheap, Bush speaks with actions. What do you think?
2007-09-13 02:59:06 · 21 answers · asked by kimmyisahotbabe 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Edge, you're wrong about electricity. It depends on how it's generated. If its generated by hydroelectric, wind, or nuclear, then it's clean. If its produced by burning coal or oil, its dirty.
2007-09-13 06:16:37 · update #1
Gore does the talk, Bush is doing the Walk
2007-09-13 03:14:03 · answer #1 · answered by John C 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush's ranch. i'm so amused by capacity of the naivete of liberals. Gore's mansions are offset by capacity of carbon credit. Gore buys carbon credit from his employer, paying himself for using extensive quantities of power. God, I want I had theory-approximately this GW rip-off. i may be the billionaire. not something stupid approximately Gore. He ranks up there with Bernie Madoff in scams.
2016-10-10 12:12:23 · answer #2 · answered by bonura 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gore is a leader of the Democrat party. Socialists and Communists fully understand that what they preach is for the low-life massess that they command. They know they can do whatever they want because they are the elite and deserve special privilages because they are the only people intelligent enough to run everyone else's lives through the government. Democrats believe government needs to force the massess to whatever they think is best. Republicans believe individuals should have rights and be allowed to make their own decisions. It's really a matter of Freedom.
2007-09-13 03:08:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush's house may be eco friendly but his policies certainly have not been. Gore should be taken to task for his wasteful ways, but that in no way diminishes our responsibility to act responsibly.
For more on the Bush record see:
http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/2005.asp
2007-09-13 03:05:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think you are fixated on having Al Gore sit in the dark.
That's not healthy.
Once more for the record, you don't need to live a cave to be concerned for the environment.
Gore has offices in his home and many people there all the time, Bush has a skeleton crew and its his vacation home, even though he takes a lot of vacation time 500+ days in six years, thats not a full time staff and family location.
2007-09-13 03:09:13 · answer #5 · answered by justa 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Typical of the hypocrite Gore
2007-09-13 03:02:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Bush thinks globally but acts locally.
Gore is literally a wind bag!
2007-09-13 03:14:24 · answer #7 · answered by PNAC ~ Penelope 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Some walk the walk and other just talk the talk.
Al Gore just talks.
Since now he is making money off the idea of man-made global warming he is in it for the money PERIOD!
2007-09-13 03:07:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush has declined Kyoto....
Bush is an oil man...
I think Gore wins, even tho he has an eco-freindly ranch. BTW since you may be ignorant to the fact, electricity is a clean form of energy.
2007-09-13 03:07:04 · answer #9 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Normal people could really care less. I would imagine that Al Gore consumes a lot more energy than Bush does. Think of his calorie intake alone. He has his own Congressman to represent his azz......
2007-09-13 03:03:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋