English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Children are trafficked globally for sexual exploitation from Russia, and are trafficked internally generally from rural to urban areas. There were reports of kidnapped or purchased children being trafficked for sexual exploitation, child pornography, or harvesting of body parts. There are confirmed cases of sex trafficking of children and child sex tourism in Russia, a major producer and distributor of child pornography over the internet.

There are reports that rebel forces in Chechnya recruit and use child soldiers. These forces also are using children to plant landmines and other explosives,

You would think that children deserved attention .

2007-09-13 02:13:40 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

The reason why is sometimes beyond big-time Lib comprehension.

1 - More people, more loyalists. Regionalism is a contrast with globalism.

2 - This earth is far more resilient and far more capable of sustaining life than big-time Libs give it credit. Malthusians all, they are risk averse with regard to the earth, but embrace Hedonism in their personal lives.

2007-09-14 05:02:18 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

Bush a wimp? He was the only ones that had the guts to follow through on his threats. The Feds have in effect "contracted out" a group called "International Justice Misson" to deal with just what you are saying. They are receiving huge grants from the government and are doing a good job. What else exactly do you want Bush to do?

2007-09-13 09:22:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Once again we have a simplistic, uninformed dope spouting off about how bad Ol' GW is. How pathetic! You don't like what's going on in Russia? Take it to your pals in the UN. They are doing such a bang up job in Durfar and elsewhere, I'm sure they won't hesitate to tell Russia how to run their internal affairs! Bush is doing his job: protecting us from terrorist attacks and carrying the fight to the ragheads on their turf, not on ours! Now, if only the bedwetting Dems would get the hell out of the way (since there's no way in hell that they would help) we can continue to fight the Islamofascists and defend the great land of the U.S.

2007-09-13 09:25:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Um....isn't Putin the President of Russia? If anyone is responsible for taking care of Russian issues, I think it is the Russians. Bush is not the supreme ruler of the world.

2007-09-13 09:21:01 · answer #4 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 3 0

Don't you think this should be a priority of Putin VS Bush? Do you people expect him to cure the whole world during his term? I think you are the one in need of attention.

2007-09-13 09:24:06 · answer #5 · answered by macaroni 4 · 2 0

Of course they do but Bush is too busy taking vacations and not educating himself on the issues and what is really going on. He is dangerously incompetent and unmotivated. He lives the good life. Why would he care or even understand what these children go through? Also, there are so many issues/problems. This is very important but with the war going on, it's hard to say which is more important. Resources are limited so far as things are set up now. We certainly have the manpower and talent to do more than what we are doing. This is why I say that GREED is terrible because it shifts us from what should be our purpose. It robs so many people of real happiness and a deeper connection to each other.

2007-09-13 09:23:46 · answer #6 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 0 5

Explain how this is President Bush's job?

2007-09-13 09:22:07 · answer #7 · answered by rosi l 5 · 3 0

Mr. Bush is President of the USA. Mr. Putin is in charge in Russia. How is it that you don't know that?

2007-09-13 09:19:22 · answer #8 · answered by regerugged 7 · 4 1

You should not insult worthless wimps by comparing them to Bush.

2007-09-13 09:30:54 · answer #9 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 1 1

No, but I wonder how Democrats know more about what's best for our military than the general does.

2007-09-13 09:17:29 · answer #10 · answered by Still Beautifully Conservative 5 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers