Why did left-wing radicals orchestrate 9/11 because they were bitter over George Bush 'stealing' the election?

Question

Do you see how DUMB that sounds? That's how the lot of you wacky conspiracy theorists sound!

Osama bin Ladin, Khalid Sheik Mohammad and 19 beasts made 9/11/2001 come to pass. Not any American political figure.

Our government (both the Clinton and Bush administrations) really dropped the ball on intelligence, though....

Answer 1

Lol, that does sound pathetic, doesn't it?!

Answer 2

I guess one of the main differences would be that the left-wing radicals are not close friends with the Bin Ladin family.

I would agree that 9/11 was not the result of an American political figure.

Clinton was actually very smart and good for our country. Having a sexual encounter doesn't seem to be the end of the world to me...sex is just sex...who cares. It affected his family the most, but not me.

However, a shoot from the hip reaction without some real consideration about the whole picture seems to have gotten our whole country into some financial trouble and accomplished very little.

Answer 3

You found us out .
We liberals high up in the government orchestrated 9-11 and blamed Bush for it .

We used Carter and Clinton to enrage the Islamics of the world knowing they would commit some act of terrorism .

When it was taking to long we knew it was time to act and got a nation the Bush family was close friends wit and recruited Saudi's to pull off 9-11 .

Its worked out pretty good if you think about it .

Many Americans think Bush was Involved and the plan is working to get a liberal in the white house again .

Answer 4

Hey, that sounds every bit as valid as any other conspiracy theory I've heard. And let's not forget, the original terrorists throughout the Middle East were originally considered to be left-wing, allied with European groups like Bader Meinhof and the Red Brigade.

Answer 5

G.W.Bush only consolidated his presidency in the hysterical aftermath of 9/11 so any liberal claiming to have orchestrated that terrorist action would only have been shooting himself in the foot and would be a fool to take credit for it.(that's only me being sarcastic in return for your little sarcastic dig at liberals)

Getting down to the REAL question....

You are absolutely correct! There is no evidence, there are no hard facts to proove the conspiracy theory . If by that theory you mean that the government knew something prior to the events and ¨let¨ them occur with the intention of rallying the nation and procuring carte blanche for the invasion of another country with no connection , or at best a spurious one,to the independent terrorist group Al Quaeda, responsible for the carnage that day, then I would have to absolutely agree with you that there is not enough information available to support that theory.

But.... I would not discard it totally if one's only reason for doing so is a lack of information. A lot of facts and evidence are going to be classfied information and available to researchers only decades from now. Many of us will be dead by then. Those who claimed that FDR and his government conspired to get the Japanese to strike a ¨surprise¨ blow at us ,killing thousands of Americans in the process in Hawaii,the Philippines and Guam,were for years dismissed as ´conspiracy whackos¨,candidates for the loony bin. Now that finally much of the classified information is out there and historians have worked diligently putting 2 and 2 together,it is pretty much accepted now by serious historians that it indeed happened that way. Our government, which desperately wanted a war in Europe, used the foreseen and avoidable deaths and imprisonment of thousands of Americans to get the country -essentially isolationist at the time- to fall into step with them.
That the Democrat, FDR, is a big neocon icon is no coincidence,I'm sure.
Many people who were dismissed as whacko conspiracy theorists have not lived to see their theory proved true.

That being said, the fact that our leaders have resorted to such tactics in the past doesn't automatically mean that that is what they have done in THIS case. It should, however, tell us that political leaders are very capable of such shennanigans and that we should not be so quick to dismiss the possibility of their having done so. A little healthy cynism will always keep our country's freedom alive and ticking.

Answer 6

they did some job getting republicans like Zelikow to cover up their deeds in the 9/11 Commission!! (the NWO is non-partisan don't fall for the false 'right-left' paradigm )


as for the left wing terrorists bit --although true in many cases thegubmint , you ought to check out 'Operation Gladio' which is an undisputed False Flag Campaign staged during that era by the western military and intelligence agencies to pin on the left.

Answer 7

I don't understand why those damn liberals invaded an oil-rich country with a non-existant radical Muslim population.

If it's a 'War on Terror' we should be destroying the perpetrators of 9/11 - the Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia.

Why do the liberals keep targeting countries with oil?

And making allies of the ones that harbor radical populations?

Answer 8

We don't have any left wing radicals clever enough to do anything really nasty. Their forte is disrupting Congressional hearings.

Answer 9

Maybe it's not as dumb as you think. I wouldn't put anything past Soros.