You might think I'm kidding but I'm not . As of this morning there are rumblings behind the scenes that several Generals are planning to call-out Hillary on her comments implying General Petraeus is a liar . They're also outraged at all the Democratic Presidential candidates because NONE of them publicly condemned that NY Times ad ' Petraeus or Betrayus' .
Mass resignations of U.S. Generals will endanger our country .
So I think it's high-time all you feeble snickering Liberals(not all just the feeble snickering ones) wake-up and demand that the Democratic Presidential Candidates Publicly condemn that ad . As well as demanding that Hillary apologize for insulting a 4-Star General . I tried to tell you guys yesterday that THIS ONE will NOT go away .
Shouldn't Every Good American Demand That Our Presidential Candidates Publicly Condemn That Moveon Ad and Hillary For Calling Petraeus A Liar ?
2007-09-13 01:37:15 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Cattledog - Nice try playing the appeaser . Don't like the truth ? Oh well , we do !!
2007-09-13 01:48:53 · update #1
I think what some of you are missing is that Generals OFTEN take calculated risks . They may be willing to calculate their risk on this one and bet on retribution for Hillary . See ? Ya gotta think .
2007-09-13 02:29:22 · update #2
Every American owes it to themselves and our country to take an honest look at the candidates. This honest look will show who is appeasing tyrannts across the globe and who has no clue as to how to best address the issues of national security.
Any candidate that will go to Syria- a harborer of terrorists, a satellite of Iran and apparently a country working on nuclear capabilities and state that the Syrian president is a good man while the US is misguided should be shot. (after the trial for treason of course)
2007-09-13 01:57:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Probably the opposite. We will need more Generals to protect the United States if America does not get out and vote. Do the research and be aware where these folks stand.
**Should the people select Clinton I recommend creating some bunkers in your over extended mortgaged homes & on the property, prepare as we did in the 60's for the Cold War. Venezuela, Iran and a whole bunch of bad guys have long memories. And long range plans too. Thank you.
2007-09-13 01:58:24 · answer #2 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
None
Real Military Men, serve their country. They are not bound by party or the pettiness of politics.
If you will recall when Ike ran for President he had to go and join a party first (and made up his mind which at the last minute) because What he served was his nation
Any General who would resign is a general we never needed int the first place, since they are willing to put party over country. we have a civilian lead army for a reason. And a real military person will follow the orders of their commander, which is ultimately the people of the United States.
Try to recall that in American, unlike say Nazi Germany or The Soviet Union, the Army follows the people's will, not the people the Armies, will. If the majority of Americans want to war to end, weather you or I think that is the right choice or not, then it ends. We do not wage war in this nation based on the will of the military. The military wages war based On the will of the people
Both sides of the political spectrum need to stop this BS that only they are "Patriots" . Both sides want we believe is best for the country and it is past time that we remember that.
2007-09-13 01:52:06 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas G 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
playing odds are a much greater ideal predictor of effects than any pollbecause, as you suggested, all of us is putting their money the place their mouths are. as an occasion, interior the final election, many polls had Kerry triumphing the election, while playing odds everyday Bush. i'm curious to work out a assessment of the opportunities on Hillary triumphing from 2 months in the past, beforehand of the latest push by ability of Obama and Huckabee. i'd think of that at that factor she grew to become into greater of a everyday, and would desire to nonetheless probably fall greater, fairly if Obama wins Iowa.
2016-11-10 07:48:03 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This nation could not handle yet another non inhaling, womanizing(you too Hillary), Lawyer,lying,cheating, dog robbing, Third World chicken plucker Clinton as a President again. During their tenure the military lost some of the best because they refused to be "Food Servers" at White House functions. THEY SOLD AMERICA OUT TO CHINA ! There is ABSOLUTLY NOTHING these money grubbers wont do for a dollar. The word "TRAITOR" comes to my mind.
2007-09-13 01:57:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think many will and not just generals unfortunately. I have talked to a lot of military since the last Clinton administration and they were not to happy serving then either and Hillary always made it known of her loathing of the military back then.
2007-09-13 08:55:43 · answer #6 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't like Hillary Clinton but no general is going to resign because one person (that they might like or not) becomes president. They may not be happy but any soldier who becomes general is as much a politician than a soldier... idealism would be as a last resort. This is a ridiculous situation.... No one throws away their lifelong career (and part of their benefits) just because of one president. We change leaders all the time and we don't have rashes of generals vacating their positions after every election. Let's be realistic and refrain from exageration.
2007-09-13 01:46:17 · answer #7 · answered by cattledog 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think her smearing of Petraeus may have won point with moveon.org but it will cost her big with middle America and those who are in the middle.
The best thing the democrat front runners were to distant themselves from this ad from the get go.
It will come back to haunt them.
Well we do know how the democrats view our generals as liars.
So the truth is out about that now.
How is that going to play when they have to get votes from vets and those who have friends of vets?
Good for the GOP bad for the DNC.
2007-09-13 01:46:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I think, while they are justifiably mad at Hillary, they will put The United States of America ABOVE politics.
Now if we could ONLY get Hillary and the rest of the liberals to do that!
2007-09-13 01:49:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
LOL!! If a bunch of generals resign because of something someone "implied" about 1 general.... then we really don't want them in charge of the military, do we?
Talk about "cut n run"!!
2007-09-13 01:51:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋